Previously,
in John's gospel, we watched as Jesus chased the sellers out of the
court of the Gentiles. I imagine that the word Gentiles is hard for many
of you to understand, as you seem to refuse to apply a Jewish
understanding to it.
In scripture, you won't find a reference to
the court of the Gentiles, but you will find this:
Revelation 11:2 NASB
"Leave out the court which is outside the temple and do
not measure it, for it has been given to the nations;
and they will tread under foot the holy city for forty-two months.
Nations
is the Greek word ethnos and is interchangeable with gentiles.
We
also talked about Jesus' genealogy, or bloodline, and how that in
Nazareth, where Mary and Joseph both came from, Mary did something no
one had ever done before, she stuck to her “story” of how this
pregnancy was God's baby; and by the way, we already know His name,
Yeshua.
It
is easy to be negative and say, " We have nothing in prophetic
scriptures that would validate your having God's baby". But they did
have an announcement of this very thing.
Isaiah 7:14 NASB
"Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold,
a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call
His name Immanuel.”
How
easy it would have been to say, " Okay, Joseph and I gave in to sexual
desire," but that did not happen.
Matthew
1:21 TLV “She will give birth to a
son; and you
shall call His name Yeshua, for He
will save His people from their sins.”
If
Mary told those gossips, who would have gladly stoned her for her
sins, that they would refer to this baby as Yeshua, it would have been
another reason to stone her.
Look
at the predictive words in the Prophet Micah, and think about the
fact that when the scribes and chief priests were brought before
Herod and questioned concerning this prophesied King of the Jews, a
two-year-old child at this point.
Micah 5:2-4 NASB "But
as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, too little to be among the
clans of Judah, from you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in
Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of
eternity." 3) Therefore, He will give them up until the time when
she who is in labor has borne a child. Then the remainder of His
brethren will return to the sons of Israel. 4) And He will arise and
shepherd His flock in the strength of the LORD, in the majesty of the
name of the LORD His God. And they will remain, because at that time
He will be great to the ends of the earth.”
Notice
that scribes and chief priests did
not deny that scripture spoke of Yeshua,
but they would NOT recognize or acknowledge Him. It is
interesting that the wise men from another nation, who had followed
His star, came to see this child King.
In the world of theatrics, there is a team of people who set the stage for the next scene. We
are not given a time frame, and so neither can I tell you how much
time has passed between the cleansing of the temple, the
confrontations with the scribes and chief priests, and Nicodemus
emerging onto the stage. When we watched the Chosen Nicodemus was
clearly understood to be a strong presence, but as He comes to Jesus,
we find a touch of humility.
John
3:1 NASB “Now there was a man of the
Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews;”
The NET
Bible commentary simply tells us that Nicodemus was "a
ruler of the Jews" (denoting a member of the Sanhedrin, the
highest legal, legislative, and judicial body among the Jews).
Finis
Dake's commentary makes this unusual statement:
“a)[There was a man]
One would be as justified to make this a parable, or any other
passage where 'there was a man' is used (Mat_12:10; Mrk_3:1.
While
there are numerous scriptural references, Dake ends this paragraph by
simply stating, All
these passages are plain historical ones.
Within
Dake's commentary is a piece of information that I was not aware of,
“b)[Nicodemus, ruler of the Jews] A Jewish Rabbi, member of the
Sanhedrin, and
one of the three richest men in Jerusalem.
I had
no idea of his wealth.
John
Gill's Exposition of the Bible
informs us that this leader,
Nicodemus,
was frequently mentioned as “Nicodemon ben
Gorion",
the
brother of Josephus
ben
Gorion
(p),
the
writer of the Wars and Antiquities of the Jews;
and there are some things which make it probable, that he was the
same with this Nicodemus; for the Nicodemon the Jews speak so much
of, lived in this age; as appears, not only from his being the
brother of Josephus, but also from his being contemporary with R.
Jochanan ben Zaccai, who lived in this time, and until the
destruction of the temple; since these two are said (q)
to be together at a feast, made for the circumcision of a child.
Moreover,
he is represented as very rich, and is said to be one of the three
rich men in Jerusalem (r),
and who was able to have maintained a city ten years
The
verse (John
3:1) testifies
that Nicodemus was of the Pharisees.
Did
you forget that Paul, who used to be called Saul, was, too, a
Pharisee?
Philippians 3:4-5 BSB
“though I myself could have such confidence. If anyone else thinks
he has grounds for confidence in the flesh, I have more: 5)
circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe
of Benjamin; a Hebrew of Hebrews; as
to the law, a Pharisee;”
“A
ruler of the Jews.”
Ruler
is the Greek word archōn,
and
according
to the Mounce
Concise Greek-English Dictionary,
this word means that Nicodemus carried any one of these titles: one
invested with power and dignity,
chief,
ruler,
prince,
magistrate.
Considering
that Nicodemus was this powerful, it is puzzling that he came to
Jesus in humility and that he could not understand what Jesus was
trying to tell him.
As
I sit here pondering my statement above, I am reminded that the
scribes and Pharisees, for the most part, wanted Jesus and anyone
who followed Him dead. There is no way that Nicodemus would have
been unaware of such emotions among his subordinates, and
what would have stopped them from killing Nicodemus?
John
3:2 NLT
“After
dark one evening, he came to speak with Jesus.
“Rabbi,” he said, “we all know that God has sent you to teach
us. Your miraculous signs are evidence that God is with you.”
Just
moments ago, I posed the question, why
did such a powerful man come to Jesus in humility?
As
you should see from the
New
Living Translation, Nicodemus
waited until it got dark.
The majority of translations casually proclaimed, “The
same came to Jesus by night.”
To point out that Nicodemus waited demonstrates apprehension and
planning.
If
you watched
The
Chosen, a
Television series that elaborates on situations, such as the meeting
between Nicodemus and Jesus, with details that the Bible does not
give us, you
would have seen two things:
1.)
The
disciples, generally, did not know where Jesus was as He would go
off by Himself, to pray until He was done.
That type of communication leads to scheduling problems. It seemed as
if, knowing that Nicodemus wanted to have a talk with Jesus, one of
the disciples was fortunate enough to make contact with Jesus, and,
therefore, made the arrangements, such as setting up the location,
some lovely candles, and a table with two chairs. 2.)
Note
what Nicodemus said: “ Rabbi,”
he said, “we
all know that God has sent you to teach us. Your miraculous signs are
evidence that God is with you.”
Nicodemus
declared Jesus a Rabbi.
Pause for a moment because that is an
incredible assertion.
What
did the thief on the cross say to Jesus?
Luke
23:39-43 NKJV Then one of the criminals who were hanged blasphemed
Him, saying, "If You are the Christ, save Yourself and us."
40) But the other, answering, rebuked him, saying, "Do
you not even fear God,
seeing you are under the same condemnation?
41) And we indeed justly, for we
receive the due reward of our deeds; but
this Man has done nothing wrong."
42) Then he said to Jesus, "Lord, remember me when You come
into Your kingdom." 43) And Jesus said to him, "Assuredly,
I say to you, today you will be with Me in Paradise."
Nicodemus
also professed that Jesus was a “Rabbi,”
he said, “we all know that God has sent you to teach us. Your
miraculous signs are evidence that God is with you.”
If
Nicodemus had the briefings about Jesus, then he would have
understood that the gossips in Nazareth would have declared that
Jesus was a Mumzer; and according to Levitical law, he would have been
banned from access to the temple, and Sabbatical schooling. There
would have been questions about where and how He was educated. The
problem with all this was undone by a portion of Nicodemus'
assertion, “Your
miraculous signs are evidence that God is with you.”
Jesus
was not the son of an undeclared father; He was the Son of God, by
declaration of the angel Gabriel.
Luke
1:26-33 NAS95
Now in the sixth month the
angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city in Galilee called Nazareth,
27) to a virgin engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the
descendants of David; and the virgin's name was Mary.
28) And coming in, he said to her, "Greetings, favored one!
The Lord is with you." 29) But she was very perplexed at this
statement, and kept pondering what kind of salutation this was. 30)
The angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary; for you have
found favor with God. 31) "And
behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall
name Him Jesus. 32) "He will be great and will be called the
Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of
His father David; 33) and He will reign over the house of Jacob
forever, and His kingdom will have no end."
Joseph,
a good man, that statement alone carries more weight than pastors or
bible teachers care to communicate, was also informed, in a dream,
that this was God's baby.
Matthew
1:18-24
NASB Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: when His mother
Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before
they came together, she was found to be with child by the Holy Spirit.
19) And Joseph,
her husband, being a righteous man and not wanting to disgrace her,
planned
to send her away secretly.
20) But
when he had considered this, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to
him in a dream,
saying,
"Joseph, son of David, do
not be afraid to take Mary as your wife; for the Child who has been
conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.
21) "She will bear a Son, and you shall call His name Jesus, for
He will save His people from their sins." 22) Now all this took
place to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet: 23)
"BEHOLD,
THE VIRGIN SHALL BE WITH CHILD AND SHALL BEAR A SON,
AND THEY SHALL CALL HIS NAME IMMANUEL," which translated means,
"GOD WITH US." 24) And Joseph awoke from his sleep and did
as the angel of the Lord commanded him, and took Mary as his wife,
Is
it possible that Joseph could not have understood the concept of a
Holy Wind from God?
Let's
falsely assume for a moment that this concept of the Holy breath of
God is a new thing to Joseph's ears.
First,
I must tell you I was told, by multiple speakers over the years, that
Hebrew had been banned during the era of Roman rule. Apparently, that
was not the case. A website entitled, Why
did Jesus primarily speak Aramaic instead of Hebrew? gives us
this information:
“Aramaic,
a Semitic language closely related to Hebrew, emerged as a lingua
franca in the Near East long before the time of Jesus. Its rise to
prominence can be traced back to the Assyrian and Babylonian empires.
When the Assyrians conquered the Northern Kingdom of Israel in the
8th century BCE, they brought with them their administrative
language, Aramaic. The subsequent Babylonian Exile in the 6th century
BCE further entrenched Aramaic in Jewish life, as the Jewish people
were taken to Babylon, where Aramaic was widely spoken. Upon
returning from exile, the Jews brought Aramaic back to Judea and its
surrounding regions. Over time, Aramaic became the common spoken
language among the Jewish population, while Hebrew remained the
language of religious texts and liturgy.”
In
“The Chosen,” there was the logical implication that the Romans,
by mandate, only spoke Greek. “The Chosen” even had Jesus
speaking to some travelers in Egyptian; when questioned about that, He
merely replied that He spent some time in Egypt; we know that is true
because the angel warned Joseph to flee Bethlehem and go to Egypt
when Jesus was around two years old. Having been told that Hebrew was
banned and “printed documents – scrolls were destroyed, you would
think that this would clearly have a detrimental impact on education.
If anyone should have had problems getting educated, it would have
been Jesus, and yet “The Chosen” showed Jesus, on several
occasions, in Synagogues, where, in one case, the scroll of Isaiah
was read from.
Honestly,
I am not sure what to believe.
Secondly,
even if these scrolls were not banned, the expense of having a scroll
copied would have been such a large expenditure that the only copies
would have been kept in the Synagogues. I wouldn't be surprised to
find out that impoverished communities, like Nazareth, might have
been able to only afford one scroll; since Deuteronomy played a
significant role in Jesus' conversations and responses, this could
have been the primary option for a large, expensive purchase.
What
does any of this have to do with Bible study?
Because
our “Bible teachers” incessantly make foolish assertions that
imply they all had individual Bibles, which borders on the impossible.
If I could imply that the disciples would go and grab their Bibles,
it would have been the Old Testament only, and they certainly would
not have called it that. The “New Testament” was being written in
their daily lives.
Holy
is the Greek word hagios,
and has meanings (according to Mounce) like this: dedicated.
Luk_2:23;
hallowed;
used of things, τὰ ἅγια, the sanctuary; and of persons,
saints, e.g., members of the first Christian communities; pure,
righteous,
ceremonially or morally; holy.
Spirit
is the Greek word pneuma
and has meanings (according to the NASEC) along the line of:
wind,
spirit:
— breath
(3), Spirit (239), spirit (103), spirits (32), spiritual
(1), wind (1), winds
(1).
The
following information comes from a Website called “Hebrew Name for
God – The Holy Spirit. It is sub-titled, The Holy Spirit as
revealed in the Brit Chadashah.
Their
website can be found here by clicking Hebrew
Names for God - Ruach HaKodesh.
Ruach
Ha-Kodesh is the Holy Spirit.
The
Hebrew version, found when I did a translation comparison, reads,
Ruach
HaKodesh.
Note:
HaKadosh
is a substantive
that means "The Holy One" (as in Ha-Kadosh baruch hu, "the
Holy One, blessed be He").
The
accent falls at the end: ha-ka-DOSH.
Ruach
HaKadosh
(Note
the spelling,)
would mean "the
spirit of the holy one"
(as in a saint).
It
is NOT used for the Holy Spirit... Ruach HaKo'desh
means "the holy Spirit," just like har ha-ko'desh means
"the holy mountain," admat ha-ko'desh means "the holy
land," ir ha-ko'desh means "the holy city," and so on.
So,
the virgin girl, Mary, has now been impregnated by the
spirit of the holy one;
and it is a term that was familiar to the Jewish community.
If
it were not for the uneducated, willing to give the new family, with
Joseph playing the role of step-dad, a dreadful time, the revulsion
of how Joseph and Mary felt would not be known to us. Jesus intentionally placed Himself into the earth's atmosphere, where some would
say He had no hope. And yet, the young Jesus, at an age just before
He would be brought into manhood, stood His ground, exercising His
apologetic with the scribes and Pharisees in the temple at Jerusalem.