Why
am I confused about this?
He
that believes on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believes
not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abides on him.
John
3:36 KJV
I
am struck by something as I read passages like this: I think about
how clear this sounds; “He
that believes on the Son has everlasting life: and
he
that believes not the Son
shall not see life; but the
wrath of God abides on him.”
Wrath
removed – everlasting life given.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is
this concept difficult to understand or do we just make it difficult?
If I can make a strong statement about Revelation and end times
events stating,
“I am not confused” then why am I confused about this?
I grew
up in church, and most of my concepts of God were presented to me by
the church, and mom. As I have chosen to read for myself I found that
much of what I learned was wrapped in misconception.
God is
bigger and better than what they taught me.
Yes, I
struggled with understanding Revelation just like everyone else, but
something happened that changed all that. Perhaps my relentless
desire to understand is a huge aspect of my understanding. Gaining
knowledge about Islam is another part. Putting both facets together,
and applying some logical reasoning, while leaning heavily upon the
Holy Spirit, I feel I have a clear confidence about where things are
going.
An
example of this happened in Monday morning bible study. The leader
responded to someone's question about 2 Thessalonians 2.
2
Thessalonians 2:3
KJV (3) Let no man deceive you by any means: for that
day shall not come,
except there come a falling away first, and
that man of sin be revealed,
the son of perdition;
The
leader said, “we cannot say with any accuracy when this will
happened because we do not know who the man of sin is, and he has not
been revealed.” The oohs and aahs rose from some. Seconds passed
and I said, “I believe we do, what if I can tell you who he is?”
Based upon what I understand about Islam, He is the Mahdi, the
twelfth Imam, and he comes in the midst of carnage and confusion.
President Ahmadinejad of Iran has stood before the UN on three
occasions and after declaring that he feels that he has been called
to bring about this carnage, has called forth the Mahdi.
The
men of the group just sat there staring at me. I
am not confused about this. A
bold move on my part; aggressive yes. A statement made in faith,
absolutely.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here
is what I struggle with.
How
do I know that I have done enough, have enough oil, or that Jesus is
really coming for us at all? Paul made a statement that if we have no
hope in being caught up then what we do and how we live our lives
makes us most foolish. But there is hope, and that is what I going to
pursue.
The
saddest aspect of this is, I
am sure I am not the only one that thinks like this.
I
know from scripture that it takes faith to please God, perhaps this
is one of those areas, but it would be foolish, I think, to merely
have faith and continue living in any way that you please.
Alright,
so I am applying faith to passages like my originating scripture, and
others.
[Believe
is the Greek word pisteno
meaning: to be persuaded; to place confidence in; an absolute
dependence upon; a reliance in the Word of God.]
What
if you trying to establish yourself in faith, or perhaps regain some
confidence?
- 1
Thessalonians 5:9 KJV (9) For God hath not appointed
us to wrath, but to obtain salvation
by our Lord Jesus Christ,
The
dictionary definition of appointed is: decreed; ordained;
established. Just based upon 1 Thessalonians 5:9, though wrath is
coming, it is not meant for those who are in Him; the Son already
took the wrath for us. God will not punish the Son again, and because
we are hidden in him, he will not punish us with this wrath that is
coming.
- 1
Thessalonians 4:13 KJV (13) But I
would not have you to
be
ignorant,
brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow
not, even as others which have no hope.
What
a concept; the lack of ignorance; Paul certainly implies that there is some
form of it, and it is the ignorance that creates the hole for
confusion and doubt to crawl through. Webster’s dictionary has an
initial definition of ignorance as: Want,
absence or destitution of knowledge. You really need to assess
whether I am lacking information, or merely choosing to accept the
information given.
Paul
wrote this in response to their fears and a lack of confidence that
had crept in on one of the church bodies that he had established.
Clearly, I am not the only one. Paul, in my mind, seemed greatly
disturbed that their
confidence had
been shaken from its foundation. Paul had delivered this message of
hope, for it is the basis and backbone of who we are.
- 1
Thessalonians 4:14 KJV (14) For
if we believe that Jesus died and rose again,
even so them also which sleep in
Jesus will God bring with him.
“if
we believe..” And I do, “that Jesus died and rose again,” This
very concept is the underlying theme throughout most of the New
Testament.
He is alive, and because he is alive his word is valid and
true.
He is coming back just as he said.
At the time of this writing
I am still breathing therefore physically alive, but there was a time
that I was spiritually dead. Accepting him made me alive in Christ,
as I became flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone (look it up).
Here is the key: “in Jesus will God bring (those) with him.
Two
things jump out at me as I read this passage in 1Thessalonians 4:15.
First:
Paul
is not making this up,
this
is directive given based in and upon the Word of the Lord.
What does that mean? It means that scripture backs this up. Think
about it! Paul preached grace and life out of the head knowledge he
had in the Torah, and inspiration of the Holy Spirit. We also know
that Jesus himself spoke with Paul in the vision on the road to
Damascus.
Secondly:
Paul, and everyone he spoke to understood that they could and should
live with a sense of excitement, as they anxiously awaited the return
of Lord. Everyone
wanted out of here,
especially if there is the hope of a better life. Again, think about
it. There is not a religion out there that does not have a hope of a
better life, and even those that think that you live and then
evaporate, at least anchor on an end of grief.
Suppose
your life is one of party until you drop; at some point you do drop.
If you happen to drop and it does not kill you, but leaves you
paralyzed from the neck down; lying in the hospital bed, stewing in
your personal hatred and fears, you are attended by Christian nurses
who speak loving words of life to you. Pastors visit you, praying
over you, all the while your head refuses all help because your
thoughts are blinded by your hatred. You lie there unable to scream
and curse them, so tears well up in yours eyes, and instead of
recognizing your deep disgust and hatred, they think you have a
recognition of the love that Jesus paid for you. Eventually you die
and instead of vaporizing, as you had hoped, you find your soul is
eternal and you get to spend eternity with your adopted father,
Satan, burning in torment with him. - Get it, no hope.
- 1
Thessalonians 4:17 KJV (17) Then we which are alive and
remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet
the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
To
be
caught up
– Greek, harpazo
means to be grasped
hastily, snatched, or seized.
Consider that both Jesus and Peter spoke concerning this persuasion
as they both gave us the example of Noah. Peter took it one step
further by adding in Lot.
Grasping
someone suddenly can have so many implications, such as playing a bad
joke, but the one that might bring concern would be the example of
getting pulled to safety when your demise is imminent. God is not a
thrill seeker, he does everything on time, but it is His time. There
is clearly the idea of rescue from a potentially life threatening
situation, on a grand scale.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I
have not refused, nor rejected Jesus Christ the Son,
therefore I have everlasting life.
So,
what is at question here?
Asking
myself this question I can only bring one thing to mind, Matthew 25
and the 10 virgins.
Matthew
25:1-12 AMP
THEN THE kingdom of heaven shall be likened to ten virgins who took
their lamps and went to meet the bridegroom. (2)
Five of them were foolish (thoughtless, without forethought) and five
were wise (sensible, intelligent, and prudent). (3)
For when the foolish took their lamps, they did not take any [extra]
oil with them; (4)
But the wise took flasks of oil along with them [also]
with their lamps. (5)
While the bridegroom lingered and was slow in coming, they all began
nodding their heads, and they fell asleep. (6)
But at midnight there was a shout, Behold, the bridegroom! Go out to
meet him! (7)
Then all those virgins got up and put their own lamps in order. (8)
And the foolish said to the wise, Give us some of your oil, for our
lamps are going out. (9)
But the wise replied, There will not be enough for us and for you; go
instead to the dealers and buy for yourselves. (10)
But while they were going away to buy, the bridegroom came, and those
who were prepared went in with him to the marriage feast; and the
door was shut. (11)
Later the other virgins also came and said, Lord, Lord, open [the
door]
to us! (12)
But He replied, I solemnly declare to you, I do not know you [I
am not acquainted with you].
Of
the 5 that did not make it in, did
they think that they believed?
The parable tells us that they were lethargic and slept, apparently
during the period that they could have made preparations.
Does
lethargy and sleeping imply non-belief?
I am not sure about the answer to this. They
all got the invitation, or was it just understood? If someone,
perhaps the family, sends out invitations, why would the Lord not
know them?
Having
had a wedding of my own, there were certainly people I did not know.
How would I make a determination that someone coming to my wedding
should not be allowed in? I would have nothing to base that upon,
unless I had some insight into the character and nature of this
person I do not recognize.
That
morning at “Bible study” I got 15 seconds to speak about this.
I
said, “the oil of Matthew 25 could not be the Holy Spirit, as Jesus
is talking to a Jewish audience, but the time frame would make his
comments directed at the modern church (the Laodicean church) because
it affects us.” While the oil may well be drive and desire, the
invitation aspect is God’s word.
Suddenly
I see something here. .
I
believed in him,
this one that first loved me. That implies knowledge of him and a
recognition of what he has done for me. Time spent with him
increases that knowledge, and relationship builds intimacy.
He
chose me.
Ephesians 1:4 ASV even as he
chose us in him before the foundation of the world. - I
cannot begin to define for you how that makes me feel. No one has
ever chosen me, and then stayed with me, no matter what, but God
has. He, with no effort at all, made a determination that included
me, throughout all eternity. I cannot take this in.
- A
Life with Him is part of our promise.
1 Timothy 4:8 ASV “... but godliness
is profitable for all things, having
promise of the life which now is, and of that which is to come.”
A promise that started with Abraham , and made toward his future
seed, of which I am now one. How would you know that there is this
hope unless someone tell you. As I think about the soul winning
techniques I have heard, all are based in the concept of fire
insurance; in other words, escaping hell. Try and answer me
truthfully. Would you have come to Him if I told you I can give you
an assurance of a life of peace with Him?
Unprepared
or un-equipped they had no oil, or at least not enough. I am not
convinced Jesus spoke of the Holy Spirit for he was talking to a
Jewish audience, and the Holy Spirit had not fallen upon everyone
yet, but the reference to the destination implies the modern-day
church (The Laodicean Church).
One
of my brothers feels the oil is worship. I like this idea so let’s
mull this over. Worship, according to Webster’s dictionary means
excellence of character, dignity, worth,
worthiness; the
act of paying divine honors to the Supreme Being.
Worship entails all that give that honor unto the one who is worthy.
He
alone, is God.
Calling upon his name would be an act of worth-ship.
What
if the oil is desire;
drive
for knowledge of him;
or the
ceaseless seeking of his face,
because you want to know Him better.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What
if I see nothing that should cause me concerns that I might be one of
the 50% that were unprepared?
Then
I should have a strong confidence that Jesus is coming back for me,
and yet I have concerns and I struggle with the idea of being left
behind. On the positive side, scripture seems to be definitive about
how Jesus and the Father feel toward those that are his.
Jesus
tells us in John 6.
John
6:37-39 ASV All
that which the Father giveth me shall come unto me; and him that
cometh to me I will in no wise cast out. (38)
For I am come down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will
of him that sent me. (39) And this is the will of him that sent me,
that of
all that which he hath given me I
should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day.
Would
it be possible, at all, for the creator of the universe to fail?
The short answer is NO!
When
you think about the fact that God claimed you for his very own,
before the world was made, displays a conspicuous resolution in
restoring a broken family back to himself.
John
6:40 ASV For
this is the will of my Father, that
every one that
beholds
the Son, and believes on him, should have eternal life; and
I will raise him up at the last day.
We
have all heard the whining, and contradictions, how
do you know God’s will?
I suppose you will never know without knowing his character, but
again, the
short answer is His word.
John 6:40 is merely one example. His will is that all who behold and
believe should have eternal life, and be raised up at the last day.
Let’s
ponder this a moment. The word behold
here was translated as see
in the KJV. The Greek word is theoreo
and carries the meaning:
A
spectator of
– That is not necessarily a good translation, for I can be a
spectator with only a morbid interest. Some people love to chase
ambulances, just to see the ugly results. Can they help? No, and more
than likely just get in the way.
To
discern
– Now this makes more sense, because it implies thought and focus.
Literally to experience or intensively acknowledge. What are you
acknowledging? All that he is, the relationship.
Figuratively
to experience
– Now we have taken this way beyond merely looking at something
with morbid intent. This is an intense knowledge.
To
believe
– Greek pisteuō
;
is to
have faith
(in, upon, or with respect to, a person or thing).
So
it is the will of the Father, that everyone that experiences or
intensively acknowledges this relationship with Jesus, and has faith,
in respect to the hope, should have eternal life.
Wait
a minute, should
implies the right or necessity, but not necessarily ownership. Even
if I use the KJV there is still a shadow, in that the translators
used the phrase “may
have”
everlasting life.
The
Greek word for should,
or may have,
is echo,
and means to
have or to hold. The
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, as well as Vine’s New
Testament Words, defines the phrase as: To
have, as in to own or possess.
There
is no uncertainty in this. We have hope; we have the will of the
Father; we have the promise of God; those of us that have received
the Son, have this life and promise.
As
I compared versions this caught my attention. John
6:40 CEV
My Father wants everyone who sees the Son to have faith in him and to
have eternal life. Then
I will raise them to life on the last day.
Somehow
this seems to say it all, and correctly.
The
last piece of confusion here is this: “Then
I will raise them to life on the last day.”
Martha
speaking to Jesus about Lazarus said, “I know that he shall rise
again in the resurrection at the last day.” John 11:24 KJV
She
spoke of resurrection of the dead that happens at the end of the
thousand-year reign, when all who remain will be judged. Albert
Barnes' Notes on the Bible agrees with me.
As pertaining to
Martha’s understanding of “the last day” John Gill wrote in his
exposition of the entire Bible:
“
The Jews were
divided about the doctrine of the resurrection, the Sadducees denied
it, the Pharisees asserted it; and on this latter side was Martha;
she believed there would be a resurrection of the dead; that this
would be at the last day, or at the end of the world; and that her
brother would rise at that general resurrection: wherefore, if Christ
meant no more than that, this was what she always believed. The
Syriac version renders it, "in the consolation at the last day";
and so the time of the resurrection is, by the Jews, called "the
days of consolation". “
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
God
committed to remove us from the coming wrath.
Titus
1:1-2 KJV ….the
acknowledging of the truth
which is after godliness; (2) In
hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the
world began;
Dake’s
notes point out that the phrase “last day” is used 6 times. 5
times of the day of redemption and once of the last day of judgment.
The
word promised
used in Titus 1:2 is the Greek word: epaggellō
and means: to
announce
upon
(reflexively), that is, (by implication)
to
engage to do something,
Thayer’s
definition of the same word: is
to announce that one is about to do or furnish something.
2
Timothy 1:8-9 KJV …..
the gospel
according to the
power of God;
(9) Who
hath saved us, and called us
with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to
his own purpose and grace,
which was given
us in Christ Jesus before the world began,
I do
not see any confusion here, but straight forward talk, about God’s
commitment to pulling us up to heaven, with Him, prior to the time of
wrath. (As a side note. I have opted to stop calling the last seven
years the tribulation. Clearly it will be a time of great
tribulation, but what it is, is a time of great wrath. Tribulation
has been with us since time began, and we are destined for it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hebrews
2:3 KJV How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation;
which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed
unto us by them that heard him;
Perhaps
this is one of those passages that cloud my waters.
To neglect
is to put off or ignore.
Is this ignorance before or after the point
of salvation? Keeping in mind that salvation or at least redemption
came at the cross, the demarcation is our acceptance.
In
talking about this I see the face of a young man I will refer to as
my son-in-law. He displayed all the emotions; performed all the
rituals (tongue in cheek), and yet the fruit he produces is
infidelity, worldliness, and greed.
So
my choice to not develop or pursue this “new” relationship is
what?
A
choice, completely of my own?
Consider
some of our techniques in reaching out to people with the gospel. Ray
Comfort stands at the beach with a camera man and a microphone,
pressuring people to admit and see their in-ward brokenness. Perhaps
they accept Christ and he moves on to the next victim.
What
did this new convert learn? That
they are, or at least were a broken liar that now has Christ, little
more. Perhaps then the problem is in how we have taught the masses.
The
son-in-law had the influence of the Catholic church, and then a few
minutes of a pastor whose favorite counseling technique was to say,
“just stop it!” Try that on an addict, and let me know how it
works for them.
Are
we teaching new believers or any believer to walk out this conversion
process with at least the knowledge that there is a hope and solid
foundation for that hope. Are we teaching the foundations of faith
that build this confidence, or are we blazing away at the
congregation about sin and their brokenness, because our pastors do
not have the faith that God is capable of keeping us in His grasp.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There
is more to this thesis, and it shall be explored. The intent is to
prove a rightful confidence in the hope and promises of God, about
our being gathered to him, and our right to a relationship built on
confidence.