Friday, July 31, 2015

A beast with ten horns and seven heads; really? Revelation 13:1

This title is fairly close to what one of the guys said, as he ranted on how no one can understand the book of Revelation. 
This particular guy acts like a baby and I am quite certain he would have to be spoon fed to get him through most the Revelation. The oddity is that he was a gunnery sergeant in the military. He of all people knows that there are rules to making and keeping things working, like a mortar. Those things have to be cleaned or they blow up in your face. Where did you learn that skill set? You either read it, or listened intently because you wanted to go home that night. 
Why do we not apply this level learning to the word of God?
As you read Revelation 13:1 you get the sense that John is in mid-thought, and it may help us gain clarity and context if we back up a step.
Revelation 12:17 ESV Then the dragon became furious with the woman and went off to make war on the rest of her offspring, on those who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Jesus. And he stood on the sand of the sea.
The dragon/Satan, standing on the sand of the sea, is doing what, looking for more victims? That seems to be his one purpose and goal - killing off those that represent God's kingdom.
Revelation 13:1 ESV And I saw a beast rising out of the sea, with ten horns and seven heads, with ten diadems on its horns and blasphemous names on its heads.
The Beast from the sea with seven heads
The Beast from the sea with seven heads (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Satan/the dragon standing on the sand of the sea and now John sees a beast rising up out of the sea.
What John saw, chronologically, places the dragon in the second half of the seven-years of God's wrath being poured out on the earth. Satan is merely a tool to carry out that end. What you do not get a sense for is any precise timing, everything seems to fall within the last of days on earth.
The beast, rising out of the sea, takes us back in time to Daniel, and yet it has an impact on us today. This is not mythical, neither is this a mystery, but deadly real, and this last ruler is alive today.
John was a Jew, and if he failed the memorization aspect of Torah school as a kid, locking him into a job as a deckhand on a fishing boat, that was not the case anymore. Therefore John wrote with an understanding of scripture and prophecy.
I get it, many of you balk at the mere concept of prophecy, but this was God's way of communicating ideas to those who belong to Him, and it is still valid today. John wrote as the Holy Spirit inspired him and it corresponded with words spoken through the hearts of men, inspired by that same Holy Spirit, hundreds of years earlier, such as the prophet Daniel.
To the Jewish mind prophecy is repeatable patterns, so what patterns do we find?
  • a beast rising up out of the sea
  • with ten horns
  • like a leopard
  • like a bear
  • like a lion
Where else do we find anything like this? The prophecies of Daniel.
Daniel 7:3-7 ESV (3) And four great beasts came up out of the sea, different from one another. (4) The first was like a lion and had eagles' wings. Then as I looked its wings were plucked off, and it was lifted up from the ground and made to stand on two feet like a man, and the mind of a man was given to it. (5) And behold, another beast, a second one, like a bear. It was raised up on one side. It had three ribs in its mouth between its teeth; and it was told, 'Arise, devour much flesh.' (6) After this I looked, and behold, another, like a leopard, with four wings of a bird on its back. And the beast had four heads, and dominion was given to it. (7) After this I saw in the night visions, and behold, a fourth beast, terrifying and dreadful and exceedingly strong. It had great iron teeth; it devoured and broke in pieces and stamped what was left with its feet. It was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns.
The first beast, like a lion, is explained in Daniel 4:34. It is also the head of gold on the statue that Nebuchadnezzar saw in his dream and Daniel told him that it was him. This first beast then is the Babylonian empire represented by Nebuchadnezzar. Nebuchadnezzar lost his sanity, eventually regaining it when he acknowledged God as supreme.
So, in terms of prophecy, what Daniel describes in chapter four, correlates with Daniel chapter seven. “and it was lifted up from the ground and made to stand on two feet like a man, and the mind of a man was given to it.”
Daniel 4:34 AMP And at the end of the days [seven years], I, Nebuchadnezzar, lifted up my eyes to heaven, and my understanding and the right use of my mind returned to me; and I blessed the Most High [God] and I praised and honored and glorified Him Who lives forever, Whose dominion is an everlasting dominion; and His kingdom endures from generation to generation.
Daniel had one more beast than we see in Revelation 13:1-2, but it is not assigned an animal form, however this thing is extremely dangerous, and does have its correlating identity.
"and behold, a fourth beast, terrifying and dreadful and exceedingly strong. It had great iron teeth; it devoured and broke in pieces and stamped what was left with its feet. It was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns."
We find the iron, in the form of the fourth kingdom, in Daniel chapter two:
And there shall be a fourth kingdom, strong as iron, because iron breaks to pieces and shatters all things. And like iron that crushes, it shall break and crush all these. And as you saw the feet and toes, partly of potter's clay and partly of iron, it shall be a divided kingdom, but some of the firmness of iron shall be in it, just as you saw iron mixed with the soft clay. And as the toes of the feet were partly iron and partly clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly brittle. As you saw the iron mixed with soft clay, so they will mix with one another in marriage, but they will not hold together, just as iron does not mix with clay. And in the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that shall never be destroyed, nor shall the kingdom be left to another people. It shall break in pieces all these kingdoms and bring them to an end, and it shall stand forever, (Daniel 2:40-44 ESV)
The ten horns are an aspect of what we saw in Daniel 7:3-7. If you do a search for the "ten horns" you only find it Daniel and the Revelation.
Daniel 7:20 KJV And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more stout than his fellows.
Daniel 7:23-25 KJV Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces. (24) And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings. (25) And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
Revelation 17:7 NASB And the angel said to me, "Why do you wonder? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns.
The last aspect of Revelation 13:1 that I want to discuss is:
"and blasphemous titles (names) on his heads."
Seven heads (I suppose this is because you tend to need a head to hold a crown) and each head has a blasphemous name on it.
What does that mean?
I have heard this stated as both a question and a spiritual position "that someone had blasphemed God and committed the unpardonable sin", all my life. However it was Jesus himself that defined what blasphemy was, and he directed his comments at the religious leaders - the pharisees.
But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils. And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand: And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand? And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? therefore they shall be your judges. But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you. Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house. He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad. Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. And whosoever speaks a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaks against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. (Matthew 12:24-32 KJV)
What did the pharisees do? They attributed the works that Jesus did, the works of “the Holy Spirit” to the devil. Did you notice in the passage that horrible things get said against the Son as well, but those things are forgiven. I am not so sure I see the blasphemy written upon these heads as being forgiven. It does however seem to play a role in their identity.
If each of these heads has blasphemy written upon it, then what is that telling us? It is telling us that these ruling authorities are in opposition to God, and by Jesus definition attributing the work of God to the devil. Is the attribution direct, perhaps not. Look at what the Apostle Paul wrote to the church at Thessalonica:
2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 MKJV (3) Let not anyone deceive you by any means. For that Day shall not come unless there first comes a falling away, and the man of sin shall be revealed, the son of perdition, (4) who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, setting himself forth, that he is God.
These people or empires are opposing and exalting themselves above all that is called God. What does it mean to oppose all that is called God?
  • Because we are in Christ and a part of his body, is it possible that in the spiritual realm we are called God?
  • Jesus told everyone that would listen that he was the physical presentation of God. Doesn't that make him God as well?
  • Is the Word of God a part of who He is? Jesus was and is the Word, and therefore God.
Who does that, opposing and exalting themselves above God? Many, but one stands out in my mind and it is Islam. A “religion” where converts are demanded to acknowledge that there is only one god, Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger. So coming against even one of God's creation is in effect blaspheming God/the Holy Spirit. (Let that settle in, you will get it.)
While all this can be overwhelming, the key for the believer is to hold to hope. However we have a problem as most of us have no idea what we are hoping in. Hope was the central message preached by Paul and it was based in our knowledge of all Jesus did and our being caught up to be with God. Thinking you are excluded from deadly tribulation just because you are a believer is wrong on so many levels. Jesus guaranteed you tribulation. He even said they will hate you because of your relationship with Him. Nonetheless, as a believer, you are excluded from the wrath that is to come. This wrath is God's wrath being poured out on the earth and its inhabitants, unfortunately people will still be coming to the Lord, and both this beast and the one to come will be actively hunting and killing Christians.

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

What does it mean to be blessed?

In Matthew chapter five we find the Beatitudes.
You know them as the “Blessed are the ….” statements.
Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
The Sermon of the Beatitudes (1886-96) by Jame...
The Sermon of the Beatitudes (1886-96) by James Tissot from the series The Life of Christ, Brooklyn Museum (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
(Matthew 5:3-5 KJV)

What does it mean to be blessed?

The Greek word from which we get blessed is: makarios – meaning, supremely blest; by extension fortunate, or well off.
So, if I look at this first blessed statement and restate it, I get this: “Well off are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”
This alone gives me problems because I see this condition in recovery every time I go there. People that are poor in spirit because of their hangups, but they are anything but well off. So this must have a meaning beyond the idea of bouncing around like a cheerleader, leading people into the kingdom with our phony smiles.
One of the men in our Monday morning bible study responded to some of the foolishness that was being voiced with, Consider that these statements were made to the disciples, while the crowd – in general - was excluded. This information was deeper than Jesus wanted or needed to go with the crowd that followed him around because they wanted to get something out of him.
This entire talk was meant to build something inside the disciples that would sustain them in the future, help them to understand this journey they were going to embark on, and in time, sustain us – the church – as well.
Now I want to know too.
Being well off, does not put smiles on people's faces all the time. Why not? Because it is never enough.
"Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:3 NASB)
Let's try looking at this in another version.
"You're blessed when you're at the end of your rope. With less of you there is more of God and his rule”. (Matthew 5:3 MSG)
Now it is making more sense to me because this is the typical reason you find people in recovery, as they finally hit the end of their rope.
the poor in spirit”
Poor is the Greek word ptōchos – pto-khosFrom Ï€Ï„ώσσω ptōssō (to crouch; akin to G4422 and the alternate of G4098); a beggar (as cringing), that is, pauper (strictly denoting absolute or public mendicancy,
MEND'ICANCY, a. [L. medicans.] Beggary; a state of begging.
This person is definitely hurting, but are they willing to be honest. I can just about guarantee you that the community around you are aware of your brokenness.
Spirit is the same word that we use for the Holy Spirit or human spirit.
If the implication here is a human with the Spirit of God in them – and it is, then we are talking about a member of the church body. Look, I get it, we are not all super-fans, or body builders in church. Some don't even know what a protein shake looks like (that is my analogy to opening their bible.) They are however on the same team, and found in this condition they are broken and desperately needing help, not a baseball bat to the head.
An aspect of the nonsense heard at bible study was the weekly barrage of guilt and condemnation over sin. If you are a follower of Christ, you have received your forgiveness for your sins, and that put you into the arms of the Father, never to be released. So if I continue to “sin” then I need to change my thinking and or surroundings, because I am certainly not thinking as clearly as I should.
"and God's servants must not be troublemakers. They must be kind to everyone, and they must be good teachers and very patient. Be humble when you correct people who oppose you. Maybe God will lead them to turn to him and learn the truth. They have been trapped by the devil, and he makes them obey him, but God may help them escape." (2 Timothy 2:24-26 CEV)
If sin is merely missing the bulls-eye, we are all capable of doing that, but in reality the target is large, and for the most part easy to hit. Doesn't that show that most of us are trying, and really do not wish to find themselves in a beggarly state.
We understand that “blessed” really has little to do with joy or the condition of your face – as in a smile, but could.
Paul wrote to the church in Rome:
May the God of your hope so fill you with all joy and peace in your faith, that you may be overflowing with hope by the power of the holy Spirit! (Romans 15:13 Moffatt NT)
Joy is the Greek word chara, and means cheerfulness. So while one might obtain a cheerfulness from possessing some thing, like a sixty foot luxury ocean power cruiser, it is not what God wanted us to learn here. I will show you why:
For all that is in the world--the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life--is not from the Father but is from the world. (1 John 2:16 ESV)
For me, the bottom line here is this. I am better off when I live like this:
"You're blessed when you're at the end of your rope. With less of you there is more of God and his rule. "You're blessed when you feel you've lost what is most dear to you. Only then can you be embraced by the One most dear to you. "You're blessed when you're content with just who you are--no more, no lessThat's the moment you find yourselves proud owners of everything that can't be bought(Matthew 5:3-5 MSG)

Friday, July 10, 2015

The Rapture is Imminent - Revisited. Part 1

English: The Flight of the Prisoners, c. 1896-...
English: The Flight of the Prisoners, c. 1896-1902 , gouache on board, 8 15/16 x 11 5/8 in. (22.7 x 29.7 cm), Jewish Museum, New York, NY. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I came across a blog entitled: The Rapture is Imminent. Since I happen to feel strongly about that I indulged myself.
The page began with "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city", however the prominent caption read:
The Great Tribulation - The Seventieth Week of Daniel - It's All About Israel.
With a title like The Rapture is Imminent, and an opening line of "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city", the association my mind wanted to make, but now clarify is: I am supposed to be looking for some connection between the seventy weeks and the Great Tribulation?
What can I determine from the statement, "Seventy weeks have been decreed for your people and your holy city"?
  • That God is mad at Israel and Jerusalem. Is that the case? Absolutely. Israel played the harlot rejecting not only God, but the Son that came in the form of the Messiah.
The quote about "Seventy weeks ..." is taken from the prophecy of Daniel, so let's start there.
"Seventy weeks have been decreed for your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to make an end of sin, to make atonement for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the most holy place. (Daniel 9:24 NASB)
Seventy weeks - we are talking about 70 sabbatical periods, each of which is seven years (70x7 = 490 years). Let me be honest, At first I found myself floundering in this, and then I remembered, this a Jewish book and the words that Daniel wrote would have made an immediate connection to the sabbatical years for the Jewish reader.
Moses breaking the tabletsThe LORD spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai, saying, "Speak to the people of Israel and say to them, When you come into the land that I give you, the land shall keep a Sabbath to the LORD. For six years you shall sow your field, and for six years you shall prune your vineyard and gather in its fruits, but in the seventh year there shall be a Sabbath of solemn rest for the land, a Sabbath to the LORD. You shall not sow your field or prune your vineyard. (Leviticus 25:1-4 ESV)
The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament – www.ivpress.com, tells us: seventy sevens. A period of seven years was the sabbatical year cycle (see especially Leviticus 26:34-35 and the reference to it in 2 Chronicles 36:21). Seven sabbatical year cycles constituted a Jubilee cycle, at the end of which slaves were set free and land was returned to its proper owner (Lev 25). Seventy sabbatical cycles equal ten Jubilee cycles.”
Did Israel follow this rule of keeping the Sabbath years? No, they ignored it and found ways around it, therefore God gave the land its Sabbath. So, over the course of time, God had Israel temporarily removed from their land.
Question: is God more interested in land than people?
No, he was interested in Israel learning to trust and comply. Having lived in Egypt for over 400 years, they were deeply assimilated into the culture of the Egyptians and followed their gods. This is shown rather quickly when Aaron created the half man, half calf god Molech, that the people demanded, because Moses stayed on the mountain so long.
When the people saw that Moses delayed to come down from the mountain, the people gathered themselves together to Aaron and said to him, "Up, make us gods who shall go before us. As for this Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him." So Aaron said to them, "Take off the rings of gold that are in the ears of your wives, your sons, and your daughters, and bring them to me." So all the people took off the rings of gold that were in their ears and brought them to Aaron. And he received the gold from their hand and fashioned it with a graving tool and made a golden calf. And they said, "These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt!" When Aaron saw this, he built an altar before it. And Aaron made a proclamation and said, "Tomorrow shall be a feast to the LORD." And they rose up early the next day and offered burnt offerings and brought peace offerings. And the people sat down to eat and drink and rose up to play. (Exodus 32:1-6 ESV)
Offering to Molech (illustration from the 1897...
Offering to Molech (illustration from the 1897 Bible Pictures and What They Teach Us by Charles Foster) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
A golden calf, it sounds rather benign to the non-spiritual ear, but there was nothing benign about it. Stephen – a follower of Christ, whom we find in the seventh chapter of Acts, is dragged before the Jewish council and there he makes an eloquent case for the gospel of Christ in his own defense. Stephen lays out a Jewish history for these learned men, and none of them disputed what he said. In Stephen's argument we gain details about the events of Exodus 32:1-6 that we do not find anywhere else in scripture. The silence of the council lends validity, but why were they silent?
John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible states: “the Syriac version here reads in the singular number, "and he made them a calf"; this was a most shameful and scandalous piece of idolatry. The Jews themselves are so sensible of the horribleness of it, and of the guilt of it, and of the reproach that lies on them for it, that it is common for them to say (c)"there is not a generation, or an age, in which there is not an ounce of the sin of the calf.''
The IVP Bible Background Commentary informs us that: “The episode of the golden calf was the incident in Israel’s history of which the rabbis were most ashamed; they felt it was the most sinful of Israel’s acts. But they grew defensive when pagans queried them about it (Josephus earlier even omitted the incident), and several centuries later they argued that the pagans who accompanied Israel, not Israel, made the calf.”
Apparently the hope is, if you don't speak of it, then perhaps the problem, or embarrassing situation will go away. Having spent some time in recovery and heard the testimonies of many that have struggled so long to overcome co-dependency, ignoring a problem never made it better. While I can understand the Jews disgust and humiliation over roasting babies on the arms of an idol called Moloch. Perhaps, their dishonor is at the acknowledgment that God, the name they would not even pronounce out of respect, killed about three thousand people over this incident.
Now, here we are talking the rapture being imminent. While the outcome for those caught up, is the glorious reality of a life forever with Jesus in eternity, the grievous facet is upon those left on earth during the seven years that follow. It will be the time of God's wrath, but it will include the wrath of Satan, lived out in the hearts of evil people.
You can solve the problem of being left behind by acknowledging that Jesus Christ is God, and that you need and receive Him into your life. Should you do that, in that moment you become His and a member of the family of God.
On my original attempt at clarifying and redefining the blog post about the Rapture being Imminent, it turned out to be nine pages long. As much as it bugs me, I am going to turn this into parts, and this is part one.

Featured Post

Will we have to go through the tribulation?

Then I heard a loud voice from the temple, saying to the seven angels, "Go and pour out on the earth the seven bowls of the wrath of...