Friday, April 30, 2010

Hebrews 11:1 "Now faith is.."

Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see.

Faith –

Vine's Expository Dictionary has this definition of faith. The Greek word is pistis, and means a firm persuasion, or a conviction based upon hearing.

Scripture also defines faith.
See: 2Thess 2:11-12; (2) a personal surrender to Him, John 1:12; (3) a conduct inspired by such surrender.

We can also use the words persuasion, assurance, belief, faithfulness, and still convey the same meanings.

The KJ concordance shows the word pistis used 221 times. 215 times it is translated as faith, but has also been translated as effect, and fidelity.

Webster's says faith is: Belief; the assent of the mind to the truth of what is declared by another, resting on his authority and veracity, without other evidence; the judgment that what another states or testifies is the truth.

To assent to something is to admit that it is true; to agree; yield or concede, or rather to express an agreement of the mind to what is alleged, or proposed.

(My comment: Assent by itself is not a definition of faith, but merely a thin aspect. To assent to something leaves the door open to one that assents due to forced coercion, and that is not God. God gave us brains and we are to use them. I may assent, but evidence convinces me.)
Truth - Pontius Pilate said to Jesus, "what is truth". He was looking truth in the eyes and could not see it. Truth means: conformity to fact or reality.
Arthur Pink, in "What is Truth"

Truth comes to a man only through the Holy Spirit, no man can of himself find it out. 1Jo 5:6, John 16:13

Truth must be sought after. Matt 7:7-8

Truth can be attained. john 8:31-32

Truth is a hard way to follow, therefore few men go on to perfection. Matt 7:13-14

Truth is infinite, it is deeper than you know. Rom 11:33-36

A warning for those who would reject truth. Rom 1:18, Rom 1:25, 2Thes 2:12, 1 Tim 6:5
Therefore if we say we have faith then we have come to admit that something is true, and we have then conformed to that fact or reality. That requires that you have made a determination as to what makes that thing true, factual, or a reality.

The world has such a hard time accepting most aspects of Christianity, for they find most every aspect unbelievable. The current President of Iran makes statements indicating that he does not believe that the Holocaust even occured. The Holocaust is documented, historical, and the remains of its impact can be seen in the tatoos on it's victims arms, as well as the remains of the buildings.

So then, the idea that I have come to adapt my life to concepts, such as the plan of redemption, or what Jesus called the "good news", that I now believe are true, makes me certain that the things I hope for are an absolute.

No one in their right mind believes that you will get everything you want. There in is the rub. Through your investing yourself in a belief in God (that is what conformity is all about), you come to understand that you are to operate in the best interest of others, and that your will is becoming aligned with God's will, because you are putting His word inside of you.
Oh, you are not doing that. My bad, I assumed that because you proclaimed His life in you, you understood what you had gotten yourself into.

A friend, a believer, let us know how sick his son was by posting the boys condition on facebook. Several of us prayed, and overnight the child had a dramatic change for the better. I have learned from scripture that God wants people well, that I can pray, and that God hears and responds. I could not see the boy; I could not see the changes, and I certainly could not see God working, but He did.

Am I always so certain? No, but then faith and trust is a building process. God's methods and attitude toward me have not and will not change, but my faith in Him grows as I exhibit confidence, based upon His word and actions, in who He is and what He does.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Hebrews 11:3 Comments by a man struggling to grasp the greatness of God.

Hebrews 11:3
By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible.

Hebrews 11:3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which appeared.(WBS)

Through pistis (faith), we concede that God formed or created the universe. How He did it, is irrelevant. The fact that we now walk upon this earth is evidence enough that it exists, but at some point, it did not.
The Greek says that by persuasion we are able to conclude that God created the universe. What is it that persuaded us?

".. we understand..."
Understand is the Greek word noieo, and means to "to exercise the mind (observe).
You want faith to be simple. I suppose it is if you do not think.

So far we can rewrite the passage to read - by the exercise of the mind, we can observe things that convince us that God made the universe. We must therefore concede that the only logical explanation is that God created the universe. Our application is called faith and demands that we come into conformity with that evidence in which we have believed. God is, and has made the universe, whether we know the definitions of how or not.

For those who want things simple, it is not. Language, a tool created by God, has parameters; understanding what those parameters are helps us to understand what God is trying to say to us. We want to believe that God demands that we merely accept things, disregarding thought, and that is just not the case.
Even though verse three, upon a simple reading gives the impression that a mindless acceptance is demanded, looking at the root of the words makes it clear that understanding is involved in every faith process.

"... that the worlds..." or "... that the universe..."
The term that the writers translated worlds is the Greek word aion. It means an age or perpetuity. The use of the word age implies a time frame, but that time frame is a period of indefinite duration, or time viewed in relation to what takes place in the period.
What we do know from scientific observation, is that time has not been constant, but has slowed down.
Read: Upheaval in Physics: History of the Light-Speed Debate - Helen D. Setterfield
http://www.khouse.org/articles/2002/423/print/

framed or formed
Greek word katartizo.
Meaning: to complete thoroughly.

".. by the word of God, ..."
Word in Greek, here, is rhema. An utterance.

God here is the Greek word theos. Meaning: a deity. It is the same word that was used when the angel told Mary that her son would be the Son of God.

So then, we can comprehend with a sufficient understanding that the ages, and that encompasses what happened within those ages, regardless of the time frames that we want to constrain them to, were completed by the utterance of God. Our understanding of those facts, based upon what we see, are enough for to develop a conviction that God did create everything in the universe. This belief should now guide our lives as we come into conformity with the creator of the universe.

John told us that the nothing was made without Jesus' word.

".. so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible."
A potter makes pots from a nondescript mass of clay, but God started with nothing that our eyes could see. Prior to this I am given some form of tangible evidence, that which I can see, but now I must assent to God making a universe out that which seem to be nonexistent.
Therefore in this verse there are two conditions of faith. One based upon evidence, the other based upon taking God at His word, without being able to comprehend the how.

This is not new for early church fathers struggled to understand these same concepts. Thomas Aquinas being one of them.

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Since we have this confidence.

    Hebrews10:19 Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus,

"...since we have confidence..."

Do you have confidence? If so why? What was it that gave you the ability to have confidence, and what do you have confidence in?

Confidence seems to convey the image of a person that walks boldly into a situation, undaunted by the task that is before them or the people that they are to encounter. This makes me think of the last speech class that I took. I can compare it to the first one. When I gave a speech, the last time, I came prepared. I had done my research; I knew my subject matter (no, I was not an expert.); I rehearsed my speech several times, and although I had notes as a back up, I typically only used them to keep myself on track. I felt very confident, but that was not the case with my first attempts at public speaking. I had been unprepared and intimidated. I literally walked out crying on one occasion.

Webster's dictionary defines confidence as:
1. A trusting, or reliance; an assurance of mind or firm belief in the integrity, stability or veracity of another, or in the truth and reality of a fact.
2. Trust; reliance; applied to one's own abilities, or fortune; belief in one's own competency.
(This belief in one's own competency is the one that scares me. Perhaps because I have, for so long, felt like I had none. We see a world that has this as their anthem, believe in yourself. The problem is that we have had this belief in ourselves to the exclusion of God.)
3. That in which trust is placed; ground of trust; he or that which supports.
4. Safety, or assurance of safety; security.


Why do we have confidence?
Based upon what Webster's says then our faith is one of a trusting reliance or a firm belief in the integrity or stability of another. Let's suppose that I had pursued some self help guru (anyone remember Tony
Robbins). Is the confidence now in me or in the doctrines of the guru? Clearly I could have a reliance in the guru's integrity. (That takes a leap of faith, for I really know nothing about the background of the man on stage.) My confidence could also be "the grounds on which we trust". Doesn't that mean that there are facts that support that position. Again I have to take a leap of faith, because people generate information and call it fact all the time. If I base my life, and therefore my confidence on "evidence", do I gain a sense of security from those things? If I gain a sense of safety, then one could assume that I have an assurance, but of what?

This is exactly what has happened within our lives during the process of following Christ. We had to put our faith in Him. That meant trusting that He could do what we found we could not. (What of those who believe that they are self made? I think that  to see into their heads would give you nightmares due to the fears they live in.) Our confidence begins to grow as we learn more, gather more evidence, hear more facts, and come to understand that there is safety in Him, for He has and will do what He said He would do. 

Here is where the world has such a problem, for they ask "where are the facts?" and "who is the man that is doing the talking?" Isn't that funny how and why God uses people to speak in His behalf. If God spoke directly to most of us, it would kill us. Daniel fell on his face as though he was dead when the angel spoke to him. Belshazzar's knees were knocking at the sight of the hand, writing on the wall. When someone who is trying to get it right, learning to hear the voice of the Lord, especially a big guy like me, speaks out and causes the building to shake, (it was a small building) people get scared and upset and do not want to hear "God's" voice anymore. Israel did the same thing. What they heard, while Moses was on the mountain, sounded like thunder, they did not like it and they did not want God speaking anymore. How did God finally come across to Moses upon His initial contact with him in the desert? God was in the still small voice. Make note, God comes across however He sees fit.

It may seem like I am rambling, but there is a point. Scripture, as tainted as one might choose to believe it to be, carries with it the power to make the Sun go backward in the sky by several degrees. It carries the life of God, and spoken into people's lives will change them too. Is it factual? Few manuscripts were written within such close proximity to the actual events, as the collection of letters that we call the bible were. The world seems to base it's life upon Greek philosophy, and yet the documentation of any of those words were well over hundreds of years later. Sadly that is more than enough time for fallacy to creep in; the very thing that the world attributes to our bible. The New Testament portion has the words of at least three eyewitnesses, and there is strong reason to believe that Mark is the same young man that we see with the blanket around him, after Jesus' arrest. Because we have supporting facts and evidence, you have every good reason to have confidence, trust, and a backbone to move forward in strength. 

God is who he said, and he does what he says. Although Jonah never saw it Nineveh was destroyed as God said. God has never not followed through. Many were fortunate, because the forgiving God relented on several occasions from pouring out his wrath, at that time.



A sad thought – I know far to many who call themselves Christians, that cannot vocalize any of the attributes that comprise their confidence in the one with which they have a relationship, God – the Father.

Why should that be any of my concern?
Perhaps it should not, but God seems to have placed a pastors heart within me, and that heart in me grieves over what I perceive as their struggle on this earth.
Trust me on this one, I understand, because I have been in that place far to often. If you have read the book of Job then you might have noticed how God points out this lack of confidence, at the very beginning of the account. Job, knowing that his adult children are going to be celebrating, worries that they might do something outside the parameters of righteousness.

Let's be honest, Job believes that they will sin. Job proves to us that he feels this way by starting up the sacrificial fires, and begins offering sacrifices to God on behalf of his children.

Whether they sinned or not is really not the point in the book. The point is: Job's reaction; the harm that his worries may have brought upon himself; Job's trust in the God who made him, and Job's ability to stand firm in the face of tremendous adversity from a wife and so called friends.

Another aspect that gives us confidence is our belief in the integrity of the one who gave us the word. In essence the Word (the bible) all comes from the Holy Spirit of God, and passed through men. Jesus was God, John testified to that fact. Jesus did what he said he would do; We have eyewitnesses to that. He established a track record of being dependable, and then leaves us with the promise of a life with him, but there is more. He left us with, not just a promise, but a definition of as much freedom as we can handle, while on this earth. (Paul, tells us that this is not a license to go crazy, but to live our lives, in Him, to the fullest.)

The writer of Hebrews tells us, based upon God's word, and revelation from the Holy Spirit, why we can have this confidence. Trust me, this has nothing to do with any strengths that you might think you have. The life that we now live, is only because of, and through the death and resurrection of Christ. I truly believe that the writer of Hebrews wanted you free, just as God wanted you free.

Consider those that God calls His people. They have a confidence in His supremacy, but not in His desire for relationship.

Here are some of the major reasons that Hebrews gives us for this freedom:



  • "because it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins." Jesus offered himself. In doing that he became the author of eternal salvation.




  • Jesus set aside the law; the law that required sacrifices to be made in order to obtain holiness.




  • He became our sacrifice, and by that we have been made holy, once for all.



  • Holy here requires some definition. This word hagiazo occurs only 20 times in the King James version of the New Testament. It was translated holy (1), sanctified (13).

    Sanctified means to be consecrated or set apart for sacred services.
    God has chosen us and set us apart, but for what? To live a life that exemplifies Him.
    Although that sounds restrictive it is one of the most satisfying experiences of you life. I speak from experience when I say that everyday I long for more of Him.

    Consecrated means to be made sacred by ceremonies or solemn rites; separated from a common to a sacred use, and something or someone that is devoted or dedicated to the service and worship of God. This is also us, for we were made sacred by the washing of Jesus blood. There is also a correlation in that scripture tells us that we are washed by the water of the word. This consecration transpired shortly after His death on the cross.

    Jesus offered himself as the sacrifice for sins, one time, for all. Then he sat down at the right hand of God, never to offer another sacrifice for our sins. By that one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.

    Their sins and lawless acts I will remember no more. The word "their" refers to the world in general; we are covered under that blanket of forgiveness that Jesus blood bought, but we are not members of an exclusive club, God did it for everyone. Now whether the world accepts that Christ died for them or not is another matter.

    Jesus has become our High Priest, God made him so, and he performed in the same manner that the earthly priests had to do, substituting his own body and blood. He did this for our salvation. Something that Hebrews tells us the ordinary sacrifices could not do.

    Do you have confidence?
    I hear some talking about respect for the Holy, but they are conveying an attitude that says we cannot go to God. Not without making ourselves pure first. We could not make ourselves pure. God poured out his love upon, why would he change his mind now? Only one reason, Love.

    We have been given an open door of access to the Father. In John 10:9, Jesus stated that He was the gate, and "whoever enters through me will be saved. He will come in and go out, and find pasture." This person has the God given right and ability to go in and out. Not out of the flock, but the word used conveys a coming forth.

    The Greek word for out is exerchomai, and carries several meanings: come (forth, out), depart (out of), escape (David said, "I have escaped from the hand of the fowler"), go (abroad, away, forth, out), proceed (forth), spread abroad. It almost gives the sense that there is more of a sending out than escaping.

    What reasons would we have to escape from God's hand? None. So, a confident person could go in and out, knowing that they are always welcome, because the sheepfold is theirs. God tried to paint you a picture that would instill in you confidence. A confidence that would allow you to feel free. A free person may not want to leave, because of the comfort, but knows full well that they can. There is a tremendous freedom in this relationship, because there is a confidence in the arms of Jesus, the one who gave his all for you. The shepherd will not leave you lost out there in the world, but will come and find you.

    This verse also demonstrates God's eternal attitude toward those who come into the flock/door. "whoever enters through me will be saved." There are no "if's" involved with that statement. The moment you enter that door you are his.

    In Ezekiel you have God saying that no matter where my sheep have gone, He will seek them out and find them. "...to enter the Most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus,..." The shepherd's pen is not the holy place, although it could well be, for how could you get any closer than in the shepherd's arms. The Holy Place was the innermost court of the temple. This was the place God dwelt (so to speak). To enter there, without sacrifice and with sin, would have meant your death. (It is not that God hated the man that came, but the sin that the man brought with him. By the way, we know from Hebrews that the sacrifices did nothing to remove the sins from the man. The blood that was shed represented a covering for those sins.)

    A hugely significant event occurred when Christ died; God himself, ripped the temple veil that had been separating man from God. Why would He have done that? Because separation included fear, exclusion, and a sense of distance from the one who gave His life for you, therefore, that separation had to end. The encompassing purpose in all this was the restoration of a family. He, by his own blood, as our High Priest, did what the high priest could only symbolically do. Jesus became sin, took our sin, and covered us for all eternity, by the offering of His own blood.

    I mentioned that God's purpose may have been solely for the restoration of a family, His. Although all that Christ did was beyond imagination, it does not bring you into the family. Perhaps a crude analogy might help. If God came to this earth, a huge adoption agency, and pays the price for our adoption ( that just happened to be Jesus own blood.) That certainly does not mean that He brought a rope and dragged us all away. The mere fact that we are still here might demonstrate that. He comes to the agency, eyeballs the lot of us and regardless of our bad attitudes, ill manners, and disabilities decides that he has to have us all. There is merely one stipulation. You have to agree to come live with Him by signing the adoption papers. In reality all that means is you have to agree to accept that He gave his Son in your behalf and wants you to choose to come live with Him. Sadly, you will have to stay here on earth for a bit while He builds your mansion, but I suppose that is a small price to pay.

    Not quite through with this passage yet.

    “...to enter the most holy place...”

    We were made acceptable through the blood of Jesus. The blood is a vital part of who we are; decisively an integral part of our salvation, and redemption.

    Acceptable? Everything was a pattern for future events, therefore the priests sacrifices and cleansing's only foreshadowed Christ's actions on our behalf. Everything was done for the sole purpose of making His people acceptable. Do not allow yourself to get lost in condemnation here. God chose you when you were not acceptable, and sent His Son, Jesus, to die to make you acceptable. The invitation to join Him has never been rescinded, it merely has to be accepted by you.

    God won us back by paying a huge price, but for what purpose? As I wrote this line I could see people sitting around a poker table, playing for a million dollars. After a couple of turns one player pushes out a mountain of chips. In a recent poker game, on the television, I was stunned to see the man betting 600, 000 dollars. He was calling the bluff of the other man. Now our lives are not to be compared to poker chips, but there is an analogy here. God gave control of the earth to man, Adam. Adam called God's bluff and partook of the tree. Problem there is that it was not a card game and God was not bluffing. Adam lost. There was another player in that game, but he was not so prominent. The background player was Satan, and he seems to have been pushing Adam to make the bad play. Satan was playing in an attempt to wrest the world away from Adam. Don't think for a moment that this mud ball called earth was all that was at stake. Remember that Satan said to Jesus that all the kingdoms of the earth were his to give, and scripture tells us that he is prince of the power of the air. There was more to his play for dominance than just the earth, he wanted to take God down. God countered Satan's hand with His own Son.

    Throughout the ages of man Satan has continued to play the game, attempting to take control by; corrupting man's lineage, inserting legality into man's worship, destroying God's people, and attempting to destroy anything that had the potential of representing Christ. There is so much more, but that is not the purpose here. God won for a reason, and you need to be asking yourself why?

    God is not interested in puppets, nor slaves. He seems to relish our personalities, broke as they are, and there is a clear and favorable attitude toward the down cast and unacceptable. Why?

    Jesus said of the woman who poured the fragrance upon his feet while weeping, then wiping his feet with her hair. "Those who have been forgiven much, love much." Dear Lord, that is every one of us, and there are few who so much as thank Him.

    God is seeking worshipers. If you look up the word worshipers and you will find the concept of kissing the ring of the king.

    Webster's definition:
    1. To adore; to pay divine honors to; to reverence with supreme respect and veneration. Thou shalt worship no other God. Exo 34.
    2. To respect; to honor; to treat with civil reverence. Nor worshiped with a waxen epitaph. 3. To honor with extravagant love and extreme submission; as a lover. With bended knees I daily worship her.

    It is human nature to rebel against forced worship, but we willingly worship those who can benefit us, or people we are look up to.

    Does God reject those who do not worship him?
    Those who do not worship seem to fall into the category of those who after adoption make no effort to assimilate into the family, but chose to display hostile and independent attitudes, expecting the new, rich daddy figure to buy them everything their heart desires.

    Why did the priests enter the most holy place?
    It was necessary to: talk with God, and to offer prayers to God on behalf of the people.
    Exclusive entrance does not mean that this was all about the priests, it was about prayer for the people and communion. The main intent of offering prayers for the people was so that they could, at least for the moment, have free communion with God. I am sure there will those that will fight with me on that point, for free communion is something that we do not seem to see in the old testament. Think about the number of people, in the old testament, that seemed to have some form of relationship with God and yet demonstrated no intense pattern like the priests did; a pattern that we attribute with closeness to God.
    (We seem to have this idea that religious activity has some exclusivity with God. What those that appear religious might have is a heart that pursues God, and often causes the outsider to have jealousy.)
    David may well be an example of that lifestyle. What we see with David is a man whose heart is constantly being poured out before His maker. Perhaps there is a communication that even David did not understand. I could easily have said, that David may not have been willing to express how he communicated with God, to us, but since communication seems to have been one David's stronger points, at least on paper, that may not be such a strong argument.

    I am really not interested in hearing that David was a prophet, although he was, since prophet status may not have been attributed to him until after he was dead. Being a prophet does not make hearing God any easier, intimate relationship does. That means that you spend time getting to know the voice of the one that you have relationship with.
    One of the scenes that we find David in, is the cave of Adullam. When you read this story, put flesh and blood on him. The cave is so called protection, there are no comforts of home, and in reality you are scared. When King Saul comes into David's cave to relieve himself; David's men are telling him to kill Saul.
    Try taking in every aspect of the chess board. Whose voice did David listen to when he opted not to kill Saul? Whose voice did he listen to when he held up the tassel of Saul's garment, called him father, and pointed out that he spared his life? By the way, that act caused David great grief and is the one of the main reasons that David said I will not touch God's anointed.

    Back to why the priests entered the Holy Place. Their entrance gave us entrance, and Jesus did no less for us.
    Prior to the cross entrance to the Holy Place was restricted, and not without fear. (Even at the time of Jesus birth priests would tie a rope around themselves so that they could be dragged out should they fall dead because they entered with sin.) God tore the veil and Jesus paid all that was due to make us right in God's eyes. Jesus even performed the cleansings for us, so that we could now enter the Holy Place. The fact that God tore the veil seems to imply that God invites us all in. This one moment in time, the tearing of the veil alone, should be one of the indicators telling us that the main purpose for the restoration of man is the restoration of communication with God.

    God always seemed to be straight forward when He talked with man.
    Abram (his name prior to God changing it to Abraham.) was apparently approached by God. (Yes, I am aware that Jesus told us that no man has seen God. Then who was it? Jesus? Scholars have argued over that for years. There really are only a handful of options as to who talked with Abram, but it is clear that they had God's authority to speak in behalf of God.) In doing so God states His position toward Abram in these terms; “as for me.” Our understanding of who God is should now be one of trust, for God has always been the one making the commitment, and risking the most in his attempts at communication and relationship.

    If we use the priests as our pattern, then our purpose is set before us; we have been called to pray.
    One of the scriptures that speaks to me of this purpose is one that God spoke to His people about. Isaiah 58:12 (NIV) Your people will rebuild the ancient ruins and will raise up the age-old foundations; you will be called Repairer of Broken Walls, Restorer of Streets with Dwellings.
    Keep in mind that all scripture is useful for the building up and exhortation of God's people. If you have accepted your adoption then you too are God's people.
    This passage speaks to me, not only into my life as a purpose driver, but as a call to God's people to speak on His behalf into the lives of those who are broken. It would be rare to find someone who does not comprehend what a broken and deteriorated city looks like, not to mention the people that live there. We have seen the news showing people, in third world nations and even in America that are broken people. There appearance is one of hopelessness. If it is in your power to do something, then do so. If not then pray, knowing that you have the confidence and right to operate in God's behalf.

    As a side note: There are many things that I said in here that may seem conceptual and not so factual. Should you doubt that I speak God's heart then I implore you to dig. I once knew a man who told me that he read his entire bible trying to find something that would back up what a preacher said from the pulpit. You have been called to do that. This is the only judging that is left for those who follow Christ, and that is to judge according to the scriptures. IS IT IN THE BIBLE?; If not, then throw it out. If you do not see it in scripture, is it because you choose not to?

    Sunday, April 11, 2010

    A word to the body, It was valid then, and it is valid today.

    God has grabbed my attention and shown me an image like a noisy drill sergeant, which snaps out commands to soldiers under his authority. You soldiers are Marines, and he gives a series of instructions, finishing with an energetic “Semper Fi” (Always faithful.)

    Why? Knowing little about the background of those under his command, he must create in these new recruits a skill level, so that during times of war they will not have to be coached on how to survive and who they are.

    God called and you enlisted you; now through God’s word He has trained you and you have become the person God designed you to be. You have questioned your standing with God and wondered why you have struggled with the simple sins; it seems as though you cannot rise above life’s circumstances.

    Romans 5:15 Gives you an answer.
    … For if by the transgression of the one (Adam) the many died, (the entire human race) much more did the grace (favor though undeserved) of God and the gift by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, abound to the many.

    We were all born into sin, and sin required a death. Jesus paid the price required for us, brought on by Adam, with His own life.

    If you think you are alive because you breathe, know this, it is only through Christ that you live, and move, and have your being.

    If you have not been commissioned, or do not understand who you are, then I would have you stand to your feet and commission you. I would look into your eyes so that I could see that what is being said to you is becoming an image that is emblazoned in your memory and heart. Another way of putting this is in relation to knighthood. You would be announced before the public, and given parameters concerning your abilities, your sphere of influence, and how you impact others and the kingdom.

    Perhaps you understand these concepts already and yet you struggle; I would remind you of whom you are.

    As you stand before God the King, I commission you this day in the presence of the God whom I serve and have sent me; I declare by God’s hand who you are this day.

    You have been adopted into a royal family, a family whose nobility shall never cease. This adoption of yours came through your acknowledgment of Jesus Christ as the redeemer of your life. I declare that from this day forward you are free from the sinful nature that held you down and separated you from God. I declare to you that because you have accepted Christ’s death and burial that you have buried you old nature with Him and like Christ, you are now raised to new life. A life in which your human nature is now hidden in Christ, regardless of what it seems like.

    Will you have opportunity to stumble? Absolutely, but you are to remember this day; the day that God’s servant declared to you who you were. You are nobility and through the Word of God you have trained yourself to rule and conduct yourself as a king. Your calling in life is to rise to your highest potential in Christ, and carry His presence in you as you wear the royal robe; a robe that was washed in the blood of the one who made you able to be adopted. When you stumble you are to get up, dust yourself off, remind yourself of who you are, and stand in an erect, dignified manner for you represent the Kingdom of the Most Exalted God. The only One to who praise is due.

    You have been: Washed, Clothed in Him, made new, brought into the family of God, established, caused to reign, and given the Father's authority to rule over and change this life.

    Let God's Grace, which poured out toward you when you did not deserve it be the light that you pour out toward others.

    Until we reign together in Glory, all my love in the Holy Spirit.

    Friday, April 9, 2010

    Thoughts and commentary on John 5:19

    John 5:19 Jesus gave them this answer: "I tell you the truth, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does.

    He healed a man, changed everything about him beginning with his circumstances, ordered him to take his bed roll and get out of the place he was in, and now He has told the Pharisees that he is the Son of God. They want Jesus dead, and will probably feel fairly justified in doing so. That is what has just happened.

    Watch any of the television show COP's and you will observe human nature in its purest state, broken. Confronted with accusations, the defense system kicks in, and the mouth starts going. Attorneys are trained to give a strong defense and so are Christian apologists. The attack by the Jews is only verbal at this point; it could get worse, and according to the law they would be right in doing so.
    Jesus responds to them, but watch the direction that he takes them. He goes to the source, the creator of the law. Only the originator can define and explain the hows and whys of what has happened before them. Speaking to Jews, deeply entrenched in religion, he speaks in clouded terms. This was no parable, but they did not get it.

    "I tell you the truth, the son can do nothing by himself;.."
    Jesus already told them that he was God's Son. If I gave a "prophetic word" to someone, and tacked on "this is what God says" then in a way I may have manipulated the persons response to the word that I gave.
    (If God should tell me to say that, it would be a different story, but he never has. I know that far to much of my humanness gets involved in what I say.)

    Jesus said that He was the Son because He was, and because He did exactly what the Father told him to do. God himself told him to speak such to these men. Consider the moment in the garden when the guards came to get him. They asked him "are you the one" and he responded with I AM. Oh dear lord, the Majesty. His response put them on their backs. This world has tacked the term Your Majesty to mere humans, and those humans have strutted around as though they were somebody. Someday they will fall prostrate before the King.

    People may say that Jesus was being humble in making this statement. I say that the Father intended to put the religious community on its ear. The time of change had come. The Pharisees were up to their necks in the law, but then so was Moses and he saw through it, and saw that there was freedom being displayed through the law. Moses, because of his actions was deemed the most humble man on earth until Christ came.

    What made Moses the most humble man on the earth?
    When the going got tough he turned to God. He was like a cattle rancher, trying to herd some of the most unruly cattle on the face of the planet. When Moses came off the mountain and hears the big party going on, he finds his own brother Aaron leading the crowd around a golden idol that they had made; totally contrary to what they had been told to do. What does Aaron say about the idol? We threw all the gold in and this is what pop out. Are you kidding me, and if so you decided to worship it?

    Even the Samaritans were looking for the Messiah to come. They knew it would be one like Moses. That would imply a humble man.

    One of the Greek words for humble is tapeinos and it is an adjective. In the NT it is always used in a good sense, but metaphorically to denote someone of low degree or a low estate. It can also mean humble in spirit.
    Webster's dictionary defines humbly as an adverb. Meaning: in a humble manner; or modest submissiveness.

    Back to Moses. Though he was considered to be the most humble man on the earth, at the time, this was not a man without a backbone. You cannot rule over that many people without a backbone. Moses was trained in the Egyptian courts, with the potential of taking over as a future Pharaoh. Choosing instead to be a Jew, he eventually leads Israel into "freedom".

    'he can do only what he see his Father doing,.."
    A man with a backbone; a carpenter, and a man that learned to submit to the voice and instruction of the Father. Standing before these Pharisees he tells them that I am only doing what I see the Father doing.
    So now we have gone from I can do nothing by myself (I suspect that is more of a submissive state, for this man before them spoke the worlds into existence, and they did not know it.), to I only do what I see the Father do. This to had to push them over the edge. How could you see what the Father was doing. These men were the trained, Doctors of the law, and there was nothing humble about them. They could see the into the law, and it showed them nothing more than what their reactions demonstrated.

    Think about this. Paul, John, Peter, and James (the brother of Jesus) all had that same law, yet they came to see the freedom that was embedded in the law, and the basis for it's being written. Hebrews tells us that the law was a shadow of the good things to come. The man that cast the shadow was standing before them.

    The Greek word for see is blepo, and means to behold, beware, to look on, regard.

    Did Jesus see things differently than we see, or could he have meant that same ability to see in the spirit that we have. Looking into the spirit (that is hard to define) is something that you do in faith. God, by the Holy Spirit, gave us that ability. It is a special gift in some, and an everyday way of life in the rest of us.

    "because what ever the Father does the Son also does."
    God created the laws that the Jews were using against Jesus, and yet by this statement God was overriding those same laws. If Jesus was only doing what the Father does, then without further explanation God is breaking his own laws and that makes him a liar. That cannot happen so there is something more to the picture than what we see. Moses understood all that. I will say it again, "the law was only a shadow of good things to come." How could that possibly be? The law carries the connotation of restrictions and bondage when most hear the term. What are we missing?
    Enhanced by Zemanta

    Wednesday, April 7, 2010

    Thoughts and commentary on John 5:18

    John 5:18 For this reason the Jews tried all the harder to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.

    " For this reason the Jews tried all the harder to kill him"
    Does that register with anyone. If this was where we started reading we would miss out on a tremendous amount of drama. Drama was not exactly John's purpose in writing. John fully intended for you see Jesus as God. Jesus had just told them that God was his Father. If they were reacting badly to the bed roll, imagine their reactions now. If picking up firewood was worthy of stoning, certainly this arrogance demanded more.

    This certainly implies something that John had not previously spelled out for us, and that was that they had already tried to kill him, and had not diminished in their vigor to do so.

    "..not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father,.."
    Jesus own disciples have not been with him for that long, and none of them really believed that he was the Son of God until after he was crucified.
    Imagine yourself standing there listening to this exchange.
    There is that possibility that John's head screamed out "what did you just say".
    Many would have walked away at this statement. Why do you suppose they stayed? It did not matter that God said the Messiah would come. None of them expected that He would come in this manner.

    In baseball we give a man three strikes and then call them out. Was this strike two or three? They had tried to kill him before by attempting to throw him off a cliff, but Jesus escaped.

    .."making himself equal with God."
    That is interesting because it seems like an external assessment, made by someone else, perhaps John. It might be that John is restating what he heard the Pharisees screaming out. There is no doubt that they were loud and vocal. They probably did their best to disrupt whatever he said from that point on, by going into argumentative rants.

    Think about the time Jesus walked into the temple and the man with the demon speaks out against Jesus, saying "what have we to do with you".
    No one said speak for yourself, and we all read that assuming that the crowd may have felt that this loud mouth was appropriate and spoke for the crowd.

    Did Jesus say he was equal with God?
    That seems to have been their assessment. He definitely declared God to be his Father. It must have been an entirely cultural understanding to say that the son was no less than the father. What does that say about the town drunk? He also told them directly that he and the Father were one, so I suppose we could say that.
    John 10:33 (NIV) We are not stoning you for any of these, replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God."
    For the Jews to go so ballistic over this it would have to lean toward a violation of blasphemy against God. We have some clear direction about taking God's name in vain, although there is huge argument as to what vain is. Here is a case where leaders rose up against Moses, and by extension God.
    Exodus 22:28 (NIV) Do not blaspheme God or curse the ruler of your people.
    Numbers 26:9 (NIV) and the sons of Eliab were Nemuel, Dathan and Abiram. The same Dathan and Abiram were the community officials who rebelled against Moses and Aaron and were among Korah's followers when they rebelled against the LORD.
    I give you this because scripturally there was a basis for the Pharisee's anger. This sounds like there is no room for argument, and yet Jesus has a response to this. If you take the time to read Numbers 26 you will see a rebellion against authority by refusing to recognize those that God had placed there. They attempted to subvert God's authority and were ultimately and quickly eliminated.

    Thoughts and commentary on John 5:17

    John 5:17 Jesus said to them, "My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I, too, am working."

    They were already furious with him. He had, contrary to the law, ordered the man to carry his bed roll on the Sabbath. It did not matter that the Sabbath belonged to God; It did not matter that this man, a man they recognized (maybe) was now well; It did not matter that this kind of thing, a healing, was a rarity, and there should have been great excitement over that.

    One of the early incidents, as Israel wandered, was someone caught gathering firewood on the Sabbath. Those that caught the man brought him to Moses for a judgment. The man was stoned to death. That should cause you to think that these Pharisee's, the keepers of the Jewish law, took this very serious.

    Now, in response to their attack about the Sabbath issue, Jesus says, "My Father is..."
    Father is the Greek word pater and means no less. The KJV also translated the word as parent.

    Let's assume that was all he said, obviously it was not, but it was known that Jesus parentage was in question, for they (the Jews) had tried to throw him off the cliff previously over such a statement. If the Jews took it as a physical parent then the barrage about him being an illegitimate child would have begun again. There was nothing about this statement that was anything less than Jesus declaring his role as God's Son, and therefore the strengths of the Father were his, and they understood clearly what he meant.

    The look on their faces must have been priceless. Silence filled the air for a moment, long enough for him to finish his thought. He buried them in the glory of who He was. Statements that should have sent them to their knees, and yet all they could do was scream and start looking for boulders to throw.

    In the "Revelation", John says, "who is this King of Glory". Dear lord, he was standing before their faces. They should have been blinded by his glory; they were blinded alright, by the god of this world, for they could not see him standing directly in front of them.

    "My Father is always at work to this very day, ..."
    That seems like an odd statement. It tends to imply that there were those that did not know or believe that God was still at work. How could you not believe that?

    Keep in mind that Israel had just gone through about 400 years of what appeared to be silence from God. Did not the man that was healed walk before them? Perhaps they attributed the miraculous to: the devils work, or some strange mysticism. In the Acts there is the story of Simon, the sorcerer, and he had a following. People have a tendency to follow the dramatic, at least for a time, but they also follow what appears to be results.

    The word translated work is ergazomai in the Greek, and means to toil (as a task, or occupation), by implication it means to be engaged in or with.

    Consider that not everything in Greek directly translates, therefore much of what we read has been conceptualized. An example of that is this verse. In the KJV it reads: "But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work". The word hitherto is the same concept used to produce "is always at" in the NIV. The word here is heos and it is a conjunction, preposition and adverb of continuance, until (of time and place). From Mickelson's Greek Dictionary

    If I restated what Jesus said, I might be able to say that My Father has never stopped being engaged with us and will continue to do so until the desired time has been accomplished.

    Jesus arrival on this earth was and is monumental, but even he stated that we were to hold on, because there is more to come. The end of all things will be a time of God showing us the things he has prepared for us.

    Knowing that the Father is working toward a goal, Jesus stated that the goal was his cause also. You saw some of that goal demonstrated that day. Jesus went to one who was broken, unwanted, hopeless, had no way to change his life without the savior, and gave him the freedom to hope again. Jesus gave him a new life.

    Thoughts and commentary on John 5:16

    (John 5:16) So, because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath, the Jews persecuted him.
    Jesus comes into the pool area, on purpose, but we do not really know that. God has a reason for everything, and this may be no different.

    Did he pick out the man and the location because it represented how broken and abused the Jews and their religion were at the time?

    Was the man singled out, like Judas, knowing that he would rat out the Savior after being healed?

    The man was clearly a Jew, because the first place he goes after being healed is the temple. I suppose it is like being in shock after a car crash, you may not make the clearest decisions, but you go to the familiar place, in his case the temple.

    Had he been put out and declared unclean because of his illness, and now going to the temple to show them, hoping to be declared clean, and reestablished back into the community.

    The crazy part of his return to the temple is that he carried his mat with him. That mat had been his close friend for many years, and he may not be thinking so straight. Now to give him the benefit of the doubt I will use myself as an example. Working at the hardware store I am asked for help constantly. I listen to the customers descriptions in an effort to ascertain what they need from me (what we saw here was Jesus asking questions of others about the man). If I do not understand (the vague way the man answered Jesus makes me think that he did not understand either) I continue to ask questions until I see that I am not going to get any further (When the man responded, logically but indirectly, to Jesus question about being well, Jesus changed tactics and ordered him to his feet). At that point I run with what I know. The problem with that is that the picture in my head may lead me to grab the objects at hand, because they are familiar, they make sense, but they have led me in the opposite direction of where I need to be.

    If you did not know who healed you, or how, and you were a Jew, what might you do? Go to the temple. At this point what else does he have, family? I do not think so, for he himself said he had no one to put him in the water.

    Back to the verse. "... because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath,.."
        What did Jesus do? He came, he saw, he asked questions about the man, he healed the man, and he told him to take up his bedroll.


    Carrying the bedroll around on the Sabbath was a bad thing. Jesus knew the law, he spoke it; everyone else knew that, and yet the man did it anyway. Why? At least he was obedient.

    Exodus 20:10 (NIV) "but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your manservant or maidservant, nor your animals, nor the alien within your gates."

    Jeremiah 17:21 (NIV) "This is what the LORD says: Be careful not to carry a load on the Sabbath day or bring it through the gates of Jerusalem."

    Deuteronomy 5:13 (NIV) "Six days you shall labor and do all your work,"

    This passage is difficult, for we want to understand what was happening here. It appears that Jesus broke his own laws. Fortunately for us he answers the ensuing questions shortly.

    "..because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath, the Jews persecuted him."Again, what were the things? He healed on the Sabbath, and that may have been perceived as work. It must have meant something else to the religious community. Think about the cleansing process. Mark gives us a clue when he shows us the man coming to Jesus and asking him if he would make him clean. That responsibility fell upon the priesthood, and yet Jesus did it. Jesus pointed out how corrupt they were, and we may have seen a part of his anger over their corruption when he cleaned the temple of money changers and animal sellers. But he did something else, he ordered the man to pick up his bed and walk.

    The word in Greek, that was translated persecuted, is dioko, and means to pursue. By implication - to persecute.
    They certainly intended to persecute him, but until then they began to follow him with the intent to overtake him. This is evidenced by the fact that they showed up everywhere he went, trying to trip him up, and catch him saying something that they could have him killed for.

    Tuesday, April 6, 2010

    Thoughts and comments on Hebrews 10:1

    (Hebrews 10:1) The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming-- not the realities themselves. For this reason it can never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make perfect those who draw near to worship.

    "The law is only a shadow..."
    Only? What then was the purpose of the law? Consider the days of Noah; men did what they thought was right, and it was only evil.

    The Greek word for shadow is skia, meaning shade or a shadow.

    ".. of the good things that are coming..."
    What was coming?
    - Christ, the Messiah
    - The New covenant (it was part of the plan all along.)

    ".. for this reason it can never ..."
    it? - the law, a shadow
    What can a shadow do? Nothing

    ".. can never.."
    But making sacrifices is what they did for years. Was it all just a waste of time?

    It does not take that much effort to look and you will see the source of what caused the shadow. Is it possible that God intended for all this, to get them to look?
    What then were they looking at?

    You cannot have a shadow without a light source. God has always been the light source.

    Things that made up the shadow:
    - The tribes setup in the form of a cross around the sanctuary.
    - The serpent on the pole. Jesus was made to be sin and was hung on a pole.
    - The rock that Moses struck
    - The water from the rock
    - The manna from heaven, and he is our daily bread.
    - The cloud by day and the fire by night.

    "..it (the law) can never... (This statement just boggles my mind. )
        ".. by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year..."
        ".. make perfect.."  (Not even for a moment?)
        "..those who draw near to worship..."  (This was not about the sacrifices or cleansing themselves; God wanted relationships. That was impossible without giving the people a way to get close to him.
    This is exactly why the writer of Hebrews could say "because we have such a high priest let us draw near.." Why? For worship, fellowship, and relationship.

    ".. by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year..."
    Did they need to change the object sacrificed? Other religions tried that and it brought them no closer to God. The Samaritans had integrated child sacrifice into their religious practices and God sent lions in to destroy them. So that did not work. But yet we understand that a representative of man ( a sin free man, and without Christ that was impossible) had to pay the debt that man owed.
    Jesus said here am I (verse 7)

    "..if it could (make perfect) would they not have stopped (the sacrifices) being offered.
    You struggle to make something work and suddenly one day you figure it out; do you continue to struggle? NO.

    "...it could never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make perfect those who draw near to worship"
    Was that the intent, to make the worshipper perfect? God knew the inherent flaws from the very beginning. Clearly a restoration of man and creation is the ultimate goal, so the sacrificial system can only be a temporary fix.
    There is an answer to this, but it is long. The annual reminder issue is not a positive feature, therefore it is not the answer. Verse 5 - "Therefore when Christ came into the world, he said: Sacrifice and offerings you did not desire, with burnt offering and sin offerings you were not pleased."

    Here comes the answer. - Verse 7 "Here am I ... I have come to do your will, O God."

    Then entire purpose behind the sacrificial system had to do with obedience
    . Consider, Jesus said he only did what he saw the Father do. Cain had problems with his sacrifice because he chose to do his own thing. Shortly thereafter we find Cain pouting and so God tells him "that if you do right it will go well with you". You can ascertain from God's interaction with Cain, that Cain knew what was right. Notice that in that story we are not told that God had that conversation with Cain, so how did Cain know?

    You and I are different. God has written his moral law upon our hearts. You can find that in Hebrews also. Should you be so lucky as to find a tribe of six cannibals,  in the bushes of South America, you would find that even they have a moral law or code embedded with in them, for they know that they cannot kill the chief, nor eat him, and they worship some strange god.

    Monday, April 5, 2010

    Commentary on Hebrews 9:7

    (Hebrews 9:7) But only the high priest entered the inner room, and that only once a year, and never without blood, which he offered for himself and for the sins the people had committed in ignorance.

    Here is the lead in to this verse.
     "The first covenant had regulations for worship and also an earthly sanctuary." Exodus 26:1; Exodus 36:1

    "..the priests entered regularly into the outer room... But only the high priest entered the inner room, and that only once a year, and never without blood,.." Exodus 30:10; Leviticus 16:34

    "This is an illustration for the present time, indicating that the gifts and sacrifices being offered were not able to clear the conscience of the worshiper. When Christ came as high priest of the good things that are already here, ...He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, having obtained eternal salvation." Hebrews 9:12

    Having obtained eternal salvation.
    One might read this and think that the salvation was for Jesus. Now why would Jesus need salvation? He had done no wrong, but he had taken upon himself, voluntarily, the sins of the world. He became sin who knew no sin, that we might become the Sons of God. But wasn't the purpose of the cross to eliminate sin, produce forgiveness within us, and give us the right to become God's sons? Absolutely, then are we not the ones that needed the salvation? Yes.

    Verse 7 tells us that he offered his own blood and body, for himself, and for the sins of the people. 
    That should have answered the question. If eternal salvation was gained, and everything was a pattern, then we gained an eternal salvation also. Jesus, upon his death, set the pattern, that was to be used upon us, in motion. He gained eternal security, and we who receive him gain this security also.

    Now how does any of that apply to Hebrews 9:7?
    1. It demonstrates that Jesus was qualified to make the sacrifice and offer it on our behalf.
    2. He had to be a man. Since the inception of the law, the priesthood came from one tribe. 
    3. He offered the sacrifice and atoning blood for himself and for us, just as the law prescribed.
    4. What Jesus did was better than anything the Levitical priests could do, for this was greater. Greater because it was one time, not the blood of animals, but his own; he did this for the world, past, present, and future; His priestly act of love eliminated the sin of the world.
    The high priest entered the inner room (the holy of holies), and offered for himself and "for the sins the people had committed in ignorance."
    Let's talk about the word ignorance for a moment.
    Webster's defines ignorance as the want, absence or destitution of knowledge. It is sometimes used for omissions or mistakes.
    (Strange, the word destitution means want or absence. So let's just say that a person that is ignorant does not have enough knowledge, and perhaps they desire more, or they are content to not learn anything that might better their state of being - I am thinking of the fellow who beats his wife, kicks his dog, and orders the kids to get him a beer.)

    We might crudely say that an individual does not know anything (Yes, we all have other horrid terms for that), but that is probably far from the truth, for most merely choose to ignore what they are told. If you have ever watched any of the live cop shows you will see this concept in action, all the time. Once the police catch  these people, the perpetrators mouth's start going off with all the excuses that they can make up. All for the purpose of covering up their choice to ignore the laws, and previous restrictions placed upon them.

     To refuse to acknowledge that there are laws, and restrictions (like no trespassing signs or danger-do not enter) does not make the act correct or legal.

    One of the things that the writer of Hebrews points out is, that the law, that thing which causes so many of us to cringe, was a shadow of good things to come. Hebrews 10:1

    Paul told us that the law had to pass away and that we now live under a new set of rules. Rules that God himself wrote upon our hearts and minds. No longer a posted sign, restricting your actions, but an inward lifestyle that has become a part of you.

    When Jesus challenged the Pharisees he said, which is the greatest commandment? To love the Lord, your God; And the second, to love your neighbor as yourself. Who needs a sign restricting you when you have this emblazoned upon your heart. If you choose to perceive this as a command then it is one which asks to you move forward, not withdraw. It asks you to set aside your selfish desires and demonstrate the love that Christ showed you.

    You were adopted into a family (God's), not because you sat, by tradition inside the building of a particular denomination, nor because you were acting so lovely, for no one was worthy to be adopted. But what did John tell us, that God so loved the World; a world filled with anger, hatred, ignorance, and a handful of people that tried to love God.

    If the law was a shadow (not the real thing) of good things to come, and they did come, can you not see the freedom the God is trying to give us. Not a lifestyle of restrictions but a constant outward expression of his love. A love which sets aside our selfish desires, and chooses to serve others as he served us. This verse demonstrates that if we blow it down here, on this earth, whether through ignorance or error, Jesus was enough. He was enough to cover all our sins, and he did it once, finished, and sat down, never to offer himself again. Maybe now Paul's admonition about not being able to repent once again, because our trying to drag Christ back to the cross to cover our errors, is not going to happen. If Christ's death and resurrection was not enough, then all this is a lie, and you know that is not the case.

    Friday, April 2, 2010

    Hebrews 8:10-12 God forgave us all. So why do we struggle so?

    Hebrews 8:10 This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time, declares the Lord. I will put my laws in their minds and write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people.

    "This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time.."
    This prophetic word is taken from Jeremiah 31:33. He goes on to explain the covenant. The question is, what does "after that time.." mean.

          The Greek word for time is hemera, and means (figuratively) a period. In Jeremiah the Hebrew word used is yowm. This is the same word used in Genesis 1:5 when God called the light "Day". It too carries the meaning of "a space of time defined by an associated term". This terminology is used throughout the Bible. Most often it has to do with end times events. I have yet to find a determinate for the phrase that will tell me specifically what it applies to in this case. I choose to believe that it has to do with Christ and the price he paid for our salvation.
    The logic pushing my belief starts with: "This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time,"
    1. The phrase is future tense, and yet the writer of Hebrews is requoting it as if it is fresh and vital now.

    2. What would have been significant for the house of Israel? They were waiting for the Messiah to come. The woman at the well understood that concept, and when Jesus told her that he was the one she believed. Jesus told the religious leaders constantly that he was the one; the Son of God. The arrival of Jesus the Messiah was and should have been monumental. There is no reason not to believe that Jesus upon this earth was the "time" he was talking about.

    3. There is the possibility that this is still a future declaration, but why, if we are in heaven, will we need to have God's laws put in our minds and written upon our hearts? We will be in the presence of God himself. Perfect knowledge, perfect relationship, perfect peace. Think about us in heaven, a place where sin cannot exist. You will not be permitted there, carrying your baggage called sin.

    4. The Holy Spirit gives us the prophetic word "this is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time,". Israel knew they had a covenant, for that had been established with Abraham, and Israel knew it belonged to them. You cannot convince a Jew of anything less than that to this day. Yet, this is again a word given in the future tense. I ask you again, what purpose would it serve to have a covenant in Heaven? Therefore the covenant has to apply while here on earth. The only time that we can see another covenant is in reference to Christ's death. Another term used for the covenant is testament, and law establishes that a testament does not go into effect until the creator of that covenant dies. God made the covenants, and God put himself on that cross in the form of his only son, therefore the testator died. If you choose not to believe that Jesus was God then this argument is irrelevant to you, but your unbelief does not negate God nor his promises.

         There are references made to Jesus on the cross as being "that day". That could easily be rewritten as "that time".

    "I will put my laws in their minds and write them on their hearts."
          Laws (Grk, nomos) carries the meanings of: law, regulations and principles. What if we change the terminology so that it reads "I will put my principles in their minds". Most of us see the word law and think restrictions. Restrictions, whether real or perceived, is what keeps many away from a relationship with God. There is an interesting passage that says that the law was only a shadow of the good things to come. Do you realize that the implications are that the law was a good thing. Consider why? Safety, morality, health concerns, cleanliness, and all during a time when most of these concepts were a rarity. When Noah was saved from the flood, all men were doing what was right in their eyes, and every thought was nothing but evil. Clearly that did not mean Noah.
         So, having God's principles written upon our hearts, might eliminate the burden of trying to emblazon it upon our memory; without God doing that, man has proved that he would not do so on his own; those that have been rare. Even today I find that there are few who are interested in God's word. Don't believe that? Try sharing some aspect of His Word that has you excited and watch the reactions of people. I have a fellow employee, who tells me that he is a licensed minister, and the level of discomfort rises tremendously in him when I try to talk about scripture with him. To be honest I have sort of given up with some, and though they claim to know my God, none of them ever come to me to discuss what the Holy Spirit is currently sharing with them.
          There is another series of implications involved in this statement. In saying, "I will put my laws in their minds and write them on their hearts." Is he referring only to those that are his? The passage refers to the house of Israel, and though many Jews take the law very serious, almost to the point of suffocating restrictions, and yet the Word tells us that they do not know Him. Let's just say for the moment that He has written his law upon their hearts. You might think that they would have recognized Him when he appeared on the earth; they did not. What if the statement is for today, and again still the Jew. Nothing has changed, with the exception of the few, and we Christians call them Messianic Jews.
         Jesus told us that he would send the comforter to do exactly what this passage describes. The Holy Spirit will bring all things to our remembrance, show us things to come, and teach us all things.

    "I will be their God, and they will be my people."
         Zechariah 8:8 says, "I will bring them back to live in Jerusalem; they will be my people, and I will be faithful and righteous to them as their God."
        God began bringing them back to Jerusalem many years ago and Israel became a state not that long ago. Jews still emigrate back to the homeland. God gave his promise that he would never again turn his back on Israel. To the Jew this may be confusing for even though God did punish them for turning their backs on God, by worshiping other Gods, they never seemed to relinquish their pride in being considered God's chosen people. Unless there had been a divorce, in a sense, there could not possibly be any truth behind a statement like this. Even though Israel seems to have returned I do not think you can really be comfortable in saying that they turned back to God. It would make sense if we looked at this in terms of God's determination to place them back into the place they hold in his heart.


    (Hebrews 8:11) No longer will a man teach his neighbor, or a man his brother, saying, 'Know the Lord,' because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest.
        
    God describes the covenant that he will make with the house of Israel.
    If that is exclusive then none of this applies to those of us who are not of Jewish blood. Thankfully we have been accepted into the family, because we were adopted. The adopted have every legal right to what the family possesses. That makes us a part of Israel in a round about way. Even if not, we are a part of God's family, and therefore the promise of his kingdom applies to us too.

          Verse 10 has God putting his laws in their minds and writing those laws upon their hearts. This has the tendency to place everyone under the same umbrella. Clearly the Jews are not evidence of this, as many of them are atheists. What does that leave? The rest of us.

    If God has written his law upon the hearts and minds of men, then why do we go about pursuing them as if they are lost?

    "because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest."
        This has the tendency to exclude anyone from the excuse of not knowing. The least of them could well be the those 10/20 window people as well.
    "For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more."
        Is the knowing an aspect of forgiveness?
         Here is what I see. God has forgiven the wickedness of the world and chosen to remember their sins no more. What does that mean? It sounds to me like exactly what it says. There are obvious problems with an open ended statement that gives us all a freedom from sin. For example: Romans says that if we confess our sins he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins. Why would He have to forgive something that has already been forgiven?
          Sin is an old english term meaning to miss the mark, and it comes from archery, where the archer might miss the targeted spot. That is something that we do on a daily basis, but it does not have anything to do with God's heart toward us. What it does do is cloud our relationship with Him, and falls entirely upon us.
          If we have freedom from sin then why do we struggle so? The answer to that falls into our court also. Romans 6:13 Tells us that we should not yield the parts of our bodies as instruments to be used for unrighteousness (sin). Why? Romans 6:14 says that sin shall not be your master, because you are not under the law, but under grace.
          You cannot escape the fact that (unless something has happened to your brain because of injury) the sin you involve yourself in is entirely a choice that you made.
          I spoke with a hypnotist once about the crazy things that people will do while under hypnosis. His response was that they are only doing things that they inwardly wanted to do anyway; much like the effects of alcohol. Alcohol loosens the inhibitions, and then you have the excuse to do what you wanted. I have the desire to dance freely before God, expressing myself as if no one was around, but I also have the desire to walk fearlessly upon the earth. Do not misunderstand, I have no desire to pound everyone into sand, although many need and deserve it, but I have spent my life wrapped in some level of fear. The moments of freedom that I have gained from that fear have been because of God in my life, and that was directly related to how much of His Word seemed to be in me.
          No, I do not make concerted efforts to memorize scripture, but my mind these days clings more to concepts. The fact that I put flesh and blood on biblical characters helps me, for now I can visualize them and they become real, with feelings and emotions. The Bible is not the sterile fearful book that people imagine it, but one that will speak to you no matter what depths you are in. God is in the business of relational communication. In other words he is actually one of those rarities that will listen to you, and not look for other things to do while you are talking to him. He cares deeply about you.

    "because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest."
          The word least is the Greek word mikros, meaning small (in size, quantity, or dignity). 
         That leaves no one out. We are so concerned that there are five people living in a jungle somewhere that have never heard the name of Jesus, and you might be right, but this says that all shall know Him. Some one would argue that the reason they would know is because they brought the gospel to them. What then do you do with the fact that God said he is the one that will write his laws upon their hearts and minds. Think about this, when National Geographic has gone to some lost people, and won their hearts enough to video tape their lives, you see that even they have some form of moral code that they live by. True some live more loosely than many of us, but there is some form of standard for civilized living within their community. Even cannibals have a code of conduct. You do not eat the chief.
         Least covers every base, economic, intelligence, and standard of living. Keep in mind that standard of living is a relative term.

    (Hebrews 8:12) For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more."



    For I will forgive...
         Future tense. The blood of sacrificed animals, we are told, could not remove the guilty conscience of those that brought the sacrifice, but under the old law it did cover the sins of the guilty. This is not just a covering we are talking about here, but a removal. A removal with the intent of clearing the conscience of the one coming to God. (I may have said that incorrectly, but this is an ever changing process.)


         We have been forgiven. There is no getting past that, but there is no getting past the sins that we so readily commit. Paul struggled with this too, for you find him saying that he was the chiefest of sinners, and why do I do the things that I do not want to do.
         Forgiven, no doubt; removed from the corrupted world that we live in no. You cannot stand next to a mud puddle, on a busy street, and not expect to get some on you. Perhaps the wisdom in this mud puddle situation is to move away from the mud. That becomes more difficult when there is no pavement on the street and the entire thing is muddy, and you have to get from one end to the other, but as most have observed that there are those who choose to let the mud become part of their character, and that something that you do not have to do.


    Sometimes I feel that the writing of God's laws upon our hearts is more of a character issue.
         Why say that? Jesus spoke of the greatest of the laws, and they were this. Love the Lord your God, and your neighbor as yourself. Even Jesus made God an inescapable aspect of our lives. It would only then be appropriate to love him, if you know how. To love your neighbor as yourself implies that you love yourself, not to some sick degree where you have to spend sixty five thousand dollars on a pair of sunglasses, but you have the dignity to hold your head up when necessary, and give a buck to the down and out that might be begging from you, because you know that there only circumstances that separate you being like the so called bum.

    "For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more."
         The NIV and the KJV differ in several ways, although they may well mean the same thing.
    NIV - forgive; KJV - merciful
    NIV - wickedness; KJV - unrighteousness

    The Greek word for merciful is hileos, and means cheerful. It implies that God is disposed to be gracious or merciful toward us, ready to forgive sins and bestow blessing. It also implies favorable.


    Wickedness in Greek is adikia, and means injustice, the quality, the act, or morally wrongfulness.
    God has stated that he will be disposed toward mercy upon us and our deeds which violate another's rights.

    Having forgiven us and graciously showed mercy toward us, what is God asking us to do? 
     
    Romans 7 may be an answer to that. Verse 6 says, "but now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the spirit. 
     
    Micah 6:8 Tells us that, "He has showed you, oh man, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.
          I must admit, at this point, that I am not clear as what that means to serve in the new way of the spirit. I can come up with an answer but that bothers me, so I will keep digging, but let me just say that though we are no longer under the law, we are under (in a sense) the spirit. It is not like the law in that it is a command for you are free to choose what you want to do, and many people do that. One character in scripture stands out in my mind, for Paul turned his body over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that the soul could be saved. Sinning does not cut you off from God, but it certainly brings about death of the body. Created in Christ's image, we walk this earth as God's representatives. When someone who is a Christian dies, there is one less contender for the faith, and Satan has one less enemy.

    Featured Post

    Will we have to go through the tribulation?

    Then I heard a loud voice from the temple, saying to the seven angels, "Go and pour out on the earth the seven bowls of the wrath of...