Would
you consider me a cheater if I told you I have been reading ahead.
This is such an exciting time we live in. Just this morning,
02/17/2013, I read that a top Iranian military official attended the
nuclear test in North Korea. You might wonder how this plays into
anything. What we do know from scripture is that in the short future
armies will amass against Israel. God will step into that fight and
rain torrential floods upon the enemies of Israel, but he will also
rain fire and brimstone, just like Sodom and Gomorrah. There is the
possibility that this war will have a nuclear aspect to it for
Ezekiel 38, 39 describe a scene in which people mark bodies for
future disposal and normal burial teams are instructed not to touch
them. Go figure!
“ For this reason, rejoice,”
"For
this reason, rejoice, O heavens and you who dwell in them. Woe to the
earth and the sea, because the devil has come down to you, having
great wrath, knowing that he has only a short time."
(Revelation
12:12 NASB)
We
seem to think that the beginnings of the earth are tumultuous, almost
as though they were filled with a rage. The statements made in
Genesis 1 about the formation are difficult to argue at best.
The
earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the
deep, and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the
waters. (Genesis 1:2 NASB)
But
at some point God called it all good. It appears that God's handiwork
really kicks in a verse later.
Then
God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light.
(Genesis 1:3 NASB)
Here
is my point. If I base my ideas of creation on some science fiction
movie I could be off by 180 degrees. Let's just say, for the sake of
argument, that what God made was perfect and something happened to
it. It could be that the something was Satan crashing violently into
the earth, for Jesus told us that he saw him get thrown out. And we
know he was in the garden at some point with the express purpose of
deceiving Eve.
If
the whole earth was perfect then why make a garden? Just speculating
here. Paleobotanists' have found petrified plant life that only grew
in lush environments, in the harshest of terrains, across the entire
globe, suggesting that the entire earth was a garden. Obviously
something changed. We can argue when that happened and why until we
are blue in the face, but you cannot deny that there was a drastic
change. I have always associated that change with Satan's entrance
into the world.
If
God tossed him angrily, so early, and Satan immediately begins making
useless plans for retaliation from the very beginning, could we then
assume that “woe
to the earth and the sea, because the devil has come down to you,
having great wrath, knowing that he has only a short time."
could
apply?
That
would mean that the earth was would have been under Satan's wrath
from the beginnings of man. But that is not what this passage is
telling us.
We
have been looking at a context and it applies, primarily, to the last
days. Specifically to the final seven year period. Some of the best
evidence we have for this argument is:
- When does this take place.And the beast which I saw was like a leopard, and his feet were like those of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion. And the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority. (Revelation 13:2 NASB)The logical assumption for this empowerment of the Antichrist is right at the beginning of the seven years, or slightly before it. It would not make sense for someone to usurp authority without some previous demonstration of ability. But then we are dealing with demonic abilities being given. This is empowerment is exactly what Jesus turned down. Satan offered him everything and said it was his to give. Think about that.The him in this passage is the beast. That is not some mythological monster but a man; a man empowered by the devil himself.Here is where the water gets muddy. There are several beasts and you need to keep your beasts straight, sort of. Daniel, in the seventh chapter states that there are four beasts. John, looking into the future describes “a beast coming out of the sea”. Read what he says he saw.And the dragon stood on the sand of the seashore. Then I saw a beast coming up out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads, and on his horns were ten diadems, and on his heads were blasphemous names. And the beast which I saw was like a leopard, and his feet were like those of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion. And the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority. (Revelation 13:1-2 NASB)
You
ought to know by now that the sea represents people of the nations
(Those outside of the church and Israel). This ugly thing had seven
heads and ten crowns. Think about that for a moment. Heads represent
governing bodies or tyrannical rulers, and history has proved them
all out but for a couple. We are watching one of the last described
as falling happen on the news as we speak (Syria). But crowns
represent rulers or ruling bodies so it is safe to assume that one or
more switch controlling bodies, several times.
I
saw one of his heads as if it had been slain, and his
fatal wound was healed. And the whole earth was amazed and followed
after the beast; (Revelation 13:3 NASB)
Wait
a second. We know that Satan empowers the beast, and that is true.
Why we even know that several men gained the title of beast in
apocalyptic writings. But here you have a beast with heads and one of
the heads sustains what many feel is a mortal wound. With modern
science it is possible to recover, to some degree, from a mortal head
wound. Here in America senator Gabriel Giffords recovered to deliver
a speech to congress about the need for gun control. If you happened
to see it I think you would agree that it will be some time before
she can return to an authoritative position, if at all. That being
said, I do not think we should be looking for a man to sustain a head
wound. If the heads are governing bodies then we certainly have an
excellent choice if we intently consider the Ottoman/Islamic empire.
We
are not told to separate this head from the freakish body that John
sees, and yet we do. So the clue as who this is comes more from the
pattern (More on that later.)
- Because of Satan's empowerment, the beast sends the remnant of Israel running into the desert where they are protected by God for three and one half years. You should understand that not all leave. Why they stay I am not sure, but the concept of the entire remnant escaping is not valid.And when the dragon saw that he was thrown down to the earth, he persecuted the woman who gave birth to the male child. But the two wings of the great eagle were given to the woman, so that she could fly into the wilderness to her place, where she *was nourished for a time and times and half a time, from the presence of the serpent. (Revelation 12:13-14 NASB)If Satan was tossed, as this verse describes, at the beginning of time, there was no Israel to call a woman and persecute. So this is clearly a last days event.
So,
try as you might, you cannot place this passage anywhere else and
make it fit. It is true that Satan got tossed out of heaven, but to
what extent. This is a subject that I toyed with in a previous
chapter (post).
“Woe
to the earth and the sea, because the devil has come down to you,
having great wrath..”
The
earth can be taken literally, but the sea, which meant people only
moments before is quite probably the same thing now.
What
is the most prolific attribution given to cataclysmic weather or
seismic events? An act of God! Really? Why would Satan change
his style or character just because God finally locked him out of
heaven? He wouldn't. So if he was thrown to the earth previously with
his bad attitude, and he gained control of the earth in the process,
then who is causing all the harm around here?
Certainly
the Revelation tells of God throwing his wrath at the earth but that
is during a specific time period. If only we could understand this.
Now
consider this aspect of the “sea”. If we are talking people then
who? Satan directs most of his energies against anything that looks
like God and the Saints of the tribulation period fit that bill as he
goes on an all out killing spree.
As
for the wrath aspect. Certainly the killing of the saints as they
refuse the mark, name and number of the beast, but he also goes after
Israel with a vengeance.
And
when the dragon saw that he was thrown down to the earth, he
persecuted the woman who gave birth to the male child.
(Revelation
12:13 NASB)
“..so that she might fly..”
The
woman was given the two wings of a great eagle, so that she might fly
to the place prepared for her in the wilderness, where she would be
taken care of for a time, times and half a time, out of the serpent's
reach.
(Revelation
12:14 NIV)
God
is not strapping two wings to the back of an entire nation but he can
certainly give them swift feet. You, nor I know how they are getting
out of town, nor do we know if all Israel has some contingency plan
should such a massive attack be leveled against them.
In
the whole land," declares the LORD, "two-thirds will be
struck down and perish; yet one-third will be left in it. (Zechariah
13:8 NIV)
It
is the majority of this one third that will make great haste out of
town.
The
idea of God taking care of someone supernaturally is not new.
Consider Elijah:
Then
the word of the LORD came to Elijah: "Leave here, turn eastward
and hide in the Kerith Ravine, east of the Jordan. You will drink
from the brook, and I have directed the ravens to supply you with
food there." So he did what the LORD had told him. He went
to the Kerith Ravine, east of the Jordan, and stayed there. The
ravens brought him bread and meat in the morning and bread and meat
in the evening, and he drank from the brook. (1 Kings 17:2-6 NIV)
By
the way, how long did Elijah live in the wilderness and get fed by
Ravens? Three and one half years.
You
cannot exclude the probability that God will do the same thing once
again. Here Israel, what is left of them, will hide for three and one
half years, the entire second half of the tribulation period. How do
I know that? Jesus said, “So
when you see the appalling sacrilege [the abomination that astonishes
and makes desolate], spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the
Holy Place--let the reader take notice and ponder and consider and
heed [this]”--[Dan. 9:27; 11:31; 12:11.]
(Matthew 24:15 AMP)
Jesus
continued to say, “then
those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains.
“Whoever is on the housetop must not go down to get the things out
that are in his house. "Whoever is in the field must not turn
back to get his cloak. "But woe to those who are pregnant and to
those who are nursing babies in those days! "But pray that your
flight will not be in the winter, or on a Sabbath. "For then
there will be a great tribulation, such as has not occurred since the
beginning of the world until now, nor ever will. "Unless those
days had been cut short, no life would have been saved; but for the
sake of the elect those days will be cut short.”
(Matthew 24:16-22 NASB)
This
appalling sacrilege happens three and one half years into the seven
years of the tribulation time.
“like a river out of his mouth”
And
the serpent poured water like a river out of his mouth after the
woman, so that he might cause her to be swept away with the flood.
(Revelation
12:15 NASB)
“And
the serpent poured water like a river out of his mouth..”
In
a previous post I struggled with this concept, even toying with the
idea of a dam breaking, but a friend of mine suggested that this was
a mass of people come against Israel once again. It only took me a
moment to see the strength in this idea.
The
serpent is Satan and he apparently has not had a creative idea
since his inception, so why start now. This is a highly symbolic
statement and not that dissimilar to John seeing the beast come out
of the sea.
Revelation
13:1 NASB And the dragon stood on the sand of the seashore. Then I
saw a beast coming up out of the sea, having ten horns and seven
heads, and on his horns were ten diadems, and on his heads were
blasphemous names.
Here
the sea is representing people, nation, and tongues. How do I know
that?
Revelation
17:15 NASB And he *said to me, "The waters which you saw
where the harlot sits, are peoples and multitudes and nations and
tongues.
So
it would not be all that far-fetched to use that analogy here.
The
concept of a flood is not new to John's readers: Job spoke of it -
Job
27:20 NASB "Terrors
overtake him like a flood;
A tempest steals him away in the night.
In
this case terrors were said to overtake someone, probably Job.
“And
the serpent poured water like a river out of his mouth..”
This
same word poured, was translated as cast in the King James
version. In my mind they have two distinct meanings, and yet not. I
will explain. If I pour out something it can be directed or targeted,
and with a very specific intent, such as watering a plant. But it can
also mean to dump with no intent or specific target and cover a wide
area. Were I to be watering plants in this manner it would be very
ineffectual.
Cast
however, based on Thayer's definition (to
throw or let go of a thing without caring where it falls),
implies something more like a shotgun blast. The impact will cause
damage, but the intent is to take out as big a target as possible,
not really caring who gets hit.
“And
the serpent poured water
like a river out of his mouth..”
The
word mouth sounds benign enough until you dig into the definition.
Thayer
Definition: For the Greek word stoma.
- the mouth, as part of the body: of man, of animals, of fish, etc.
- the edge of a sword.
In
this case it is easy to visualize Satan pouring water out of his
mouth. Of course it is for most of us have seen some statue that has
water spewing out of its mouth. But only one verse later the earth is
opening its mouth and swallowing the flood. The word stoma has not
changed, nor has the definition, but the earth does not, as we
understand it, have a mouth. So what is he talking about.
This
same word was translated as the edge of the sword twice: Luke_21:24,
Hebrews_11:34
Jesus was speaking of
this very scenario when he said,
Luke
21:24 NASB and they will fall by the edge of
the sword, and will be led captive into all the nations; and
Jerusalem will be trampled under foot by the Gentiles until the times
of the Gentiles are fulfilled.
So
what we have is another large attack against those of Israel that:
- Still remain in Israel
- Have not taken the mark, the name, or worshiped the beast.
- And obviously have not been slaughtered yet.
But the earth helped the woman
But
the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened its mouth and drank
up the river which the dragon poured out of his mouth.
(Revelation
12:16 NASB)
“But
the earth helped the woman,..”
Back
to Thayer. I realize that to say the earth is fairly understandable
but having God thrown in the mix tends to give it a life of its own.
Thayer's
definition includes:
- arable land
- the ground, the earth as a standing place.
- the main land as opposed to the sea or water
So
the earth helped Israel.
Is
this a new concept? Not if you have read through the bible. I will
give you a couple of examples:
And
the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up, and their houses,
and all the men that appertained unto Korah, and all their goods.
(Numbers
16:32 KJV)
and
what he did to Dathan and Abiram, sons of Eliab the Reubenite, when
the earth opened its mouth right in the middle of all Israel and
swallowed them up with their households, their tents and every living
thing that belonged to them.
(Deuteronomy
11:6 NIV)
In
the two passages shared here there is no water or sea but people, and
again, I do not believe that this a flood of water referred to in
Revelation 12.
“..and he went away to wage war on the remainder..”
So
then the dragon was furious (enraged) at the woman, and he went away
to wage war on the remainder of her descendants--[on those] who obey
God's commandments and who have the testimony of Jesus Christ [and
adhere to it and bear witness to Him].
(Revelation
12:17 AMP)
Thwarted
in his attempt to kill the escaping remnant, he goes away, back we
assume into Israel, to make war on the remainder of the descendants.
A word of caution: When you have a clear, logical path assumption is
not bad and provides clarity, but without a clear path assumption can
lead you incorrectly and have you looking in the wrong direction.
If
I look at the broader picture. Christ came into the world and the
dragon was waiting to kill him. Unable to do that he waged war on the
church. But you have to keep the context clear on your exploratory
missions. This is about him waging war on the descendants of the
woman, and the woman is Israel.
Again,
this is exclusively an end times event being spoken of.
Israel,
being warned of God to flee when they see the abomination in the
temple, should have evacuated the country. Maybe that is the problem.
Most will understand that the majority of the comments about Israel
seem to focus on Jerusalem, therefore the majority who escape are
from Jerusalem while others in Israel think they are safe. That will
not be the case.
Revelation
13:10 CJB "If anyone is meant for captivity, into captivity
he goes! If anyone is to be killed with the sword, with the sword he
is to be killed!" This is when God's holy people must persevere
and trust!
This
passage is integrated into the context of the beast's war upon the
saints and its potential impact. It is easy to see that some will
survive, making it all the way to Christ's return. How Christ deals
with those is entirely up to him. I can speculate but that is really
pointless.
the
rest of her seed, those keeping the commandments of God, and having
the testimony of Jesus Christ.
Satan
went away to make war with “her descendants”, and yet it speaks
of those who obey God's commandments and have the testimony of Jesus
Christ.
Wait
a minute, think this through.
Typically,
we do not understand Israel as having the testimony of Jesus Christ.
I would love to see that happen but I know that will not be the
majority. Scripture even tells us that the “elect” will be
deceived by the miracles that the false prophet works. The deceived
will take the mark and worship the beast, sealing their fate. But
keep in mind that we rarely are to take comments like “all Israel”
as literal. Instead, is it wiser to think in terms of a majority, or
a lot of them. If this passage says they have the testimony of
Christ, then we have to assume that during the tribulation many of
Israel will turn to Christ as the Messiah they were waiting for.
God
performs a few of his own miracles to catch the elect. Observe.
And
I saw another angel flying in mid-heaven, having an everlasting
gospel to proclaim to those dwelling on the earth, even to every
nation and tribe and tongue and people, saying in a great voice, Fear
God, and give glory to Him, because the hour of His judgment has
come; also, Worship "Him who has made the heaven, and the earth,
and the sea," and the springs of waters. Ex. 20:11
(Revelation
14:6-7 LITV)
Revelation
14 is not the first place we see this type of activity, and there is
no doubt that it will have a huge impact, not only on Israel but on
the world.
This
has the possibility of including followers of Jesus Christ,
tribulation saints, as well as Jews, because this terminology “having
the testimony of” can also include tribulation saints.
And
when He opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of
those having been slain for the Word of God, and for the witness
which they had.
(Revelation
6:9 LITV)
You
do not have to wait until an angel flies overhead shouting out the
glories of God and how to become his; give your life to him now, you
are making a mess of it anyway and Jesus already paid the price for
your freedom. Run to him, accept his love for you and be received
into his kingdom. Doing this gives the hope of a life with him, and
Jesus told us that he would come back for us, and rescue us just
before pouring out his wrath on the earth. Sure you can wait if you
wish, missing out on the period of grace, choosing to endure what is
to come during the time of wrath, but why?
Life
here on earth during the seven years after the church is pulled out
of here will be a little taste of hell. Jesus told us that he is the
only way to the Father, not religion, not cults, not good works, but
a faith in Jesus Christ alone. That act of belief is the only hope of
being caught up with the church before the tribulation.
But
is it the only hope? Not necessarily. You can refuse the mark of the
beast that indicates your allegiance to the beast and his ways, and
you must refuse to worship the beast. Scripture tells us that very
few will survive this onslaught. Refusing to take his mark should get
you beheaded and get you your ticket to reign with Christ during the
millennial years. But as I noted before, there may be survivors of
the beast that make it through until Jesus returns. Standing as one
that testifies to Jesus Christ as King of the earth should get you
into the kingdom, but what your life will look like I do not know. I
can see a picture of heartless captivity for you, and it will not be
pretty. Why wait to find out.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to make a relevant comment. If approved, it will be posted.