I ended the previous post with these verses.
Revelation
16:13-14 NLT And I saw three evil spirits that looked like
frogs leap from the mouths of the dragon, the beast, and the false
prophet. (14) They are demonic spirits who work miracles
and go out to all the rulers of the world to gather them for battle
against the Lord on that great judgment day of God the Almighty.
What
can I gather from this?
That
the evil spirits leap from the mouths of the dragon/Satan;
the beast/antichrist; and the false prophet. The
spirits are clearly identified as demon spirits. Demons are not some
bizarre, original creation, they are fallen, angels. Now, there might
be some association with the hybrids created by the Nephalim having
sexual relations with human women, but I will leave it at that.
Defining
the false prophet is not a simplistic answer, so let's dig into this
for a moment.
If
I were to say, there was an oil spill, would you assume it was an oil
tanker in the Persian gulf that got hit with an explosive UAV, or
would you theorize that I had a bad moment while trying to fry
chicken?
As
you can see the answer requires a bit more information doesn't it,
especially if I wanted you to be able to perceive an accurate mental
picture. Now apply my logic, in this case, to whom or what this
person is.
Another
assumption we make, as religious Christians, is that we cannot look
outside of the religious box we live in. Let's apply this
assumption to the oil scenario. If you are a chef, can you receive
information that provokes you to consider oils other than, olive or
vegetable oil, especially if you wanted to comprehend something like
a ruptured oil line in Long Beach Harbor, that was damaged by a ships
anchor and polluted miles of beaches? Any reasonable person would and
should.
Why
tell you any of this?
Because there was a day at church when we were having lunch together. I can
be rather introverted at times and on this particular day, I chose to
make conversation with some people I had seen frequently but never
talked with. Just days before this moment I had come across
archaeological information from Israel that opened a door that
changed the way I look at Jesus, “the carpenter.”
The
first consideration about Jesus being a carpenter, and part of my
religious mentality is,
He did NOT say these words about Himself; they were spoken by others about His father.
Secondly, those speaking about Him did NOT say carpenter, they called Him a tektōn.
A tektōn is a craftsman and does not limit Him to being a carpenter.
The idea of Him being a carpenter came from tradition and tradition said, you learned your father's trade. If you want to have a
problem with this, you can take guesses as to how old Jesus was when Joseph died.
So we cannot assume that Jesus was a carpenter, but we do.
So,
how does this information change my life or perception?
Perhaps
it does not change anything unless you are willing to consider
information OTHER than direct Biblical information.
Guess
what I talked about with these strangers? Archaeology, and how
the Israeli archaeologists had uncovered a granite quarry, no more
than a quarter-mile outside of Nazareth, the town Jesus grew up in.
At the quarry, those scientists found broken and partially completed
remnants of granite drinkware, all of which showed clear lathe
marks. The family I shared this information with seemed to follow
what I was saying.
With
only a moment's hesitation, the husband says, “I do NOT believe
that we should consider anything extra-biblical
in forming our understanding of Jesus.”
I
responded by saying, fascinating that you should say that, as
we accept the idea that Jesus was a carpenter when the Greek
terminology tells us that Jesus was a tektōn.
We don't challenge what the
word tektōn
means, we merely accept that it
means Jesus was a carpenter, however, it is an undefined term and
cannot be defined without additional information.
So
what do we do?
We
chose to ignore that archaeology has intelligibly demonstrated that
it was possible for Jesus to be a craftsman at this particular
quarry.
You
might try to tell me that we have no evidence to demonstrate that
Jesus was a craftsman with granite, but we do, and it is NOT so
un-biblical. In the second chapter of John's gospel, Jesus and the
disciples were invited to a wedding in Cana of Galilee.
“On the third day
there was a wedding in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was
there; and both Jesus and His disciples were invited to the wedding.
When the wine ran out, the mother of Jesus *said to Him, "They
have no wine." And Jesus *said to her, "Woman, what does
that have to do with us? My hour has not yet come." His mother
*said to the servants, "Whatever He says to you, do it."”
(John 2:1-5 NASB)
No
other disciple recorded this incident so we have NO other
biblical information to pull from, and, therefore, have to make
logical, even non-biblical assumptions.
What we do see is a mother inserting herself into a situation that may not have been her responsibility.
We do not know how she would know they were out of wine,
And, neither do we know the nationality of the servants that
Mary spoke to.
To say they were Jewish servants is pure conjecture on your part. Since the Jews were so quick to tell Jesus, we have NEVER
been slaves to anyone, we must presume that these were Gentile slaves.
What is made very clear to us, is that Mary understood
Jesus' capabilities for the miraculous, and told the
servants, “Whatever He says to you, do it.”
What
happened next is extraordinary.
Now there were six
stone water-pots set there for the Jewish custom of
purification, containing twenty or thirty gallons each. Jesus *said
to them, "Fill the water-pots with water." So they filled
them up to the brim. And He *said to them, "Draw some out now
and take it to the headwaiter." So they took it to him. (John
2:6-8 NASB)
Nobody
pays attention to the fact that these stone pots were most likely
handcrafted, lathed, and capable of holding up to thirty gallons of
water; and quite possibly made one-quarter mile outside of Nazareth.
The other significant thing was that they were made of stone.
What
is the big deal about that?
Israel
had some severe sanitary laws, laid out by God, that they had to
abide by. For example.
'As for any
earthenware vessel into which one of them may fall, whatever is in
it becomes unclean and you shall break the vessel. (Leviticus
11:33 NASB)
For
the longest time, all they had was wood or clay vessels from which to
eat. However, history records that several years prior to this
wedding, an enterprising Jewish council member, realizing that the
restrictions of God's law said NOTHING about granite and
therefore was meant by God to always be ceremonially clean, This
entrepreneur presented his case to the council and they agreed. From
that day forward granite was declared perpetually clean and is looked
on as clean to this day. For the most part, we Gentiles know
nothing about Jewish laws concerning cleanliness, nor do we know that
a Jew could explain this to you if you asked, as they hold to this
exception today. If those pots had been earthenware and Gentile
slaves had touched them, the pots would have to be broken and
trashed; but since they were granite, Jesus could have slaves fill
them, without a thought.
Is
it possible that the craftsman, Jesus, made those very pots?
We
have nothing to tell us otherwise. Because Jewish law was modified,
it was now possible for Gentiles to fill the waterpots without harm.
All this information may have
played a role in Jesus turning the water into wine, but should
you exclude it because it is extra-biblical?
The answer from this man I spoke to was, no.
If I have done my job in conveying this story, then you should be
able to see that extra-biblical
information might help to explain who this false prophet is.
While we, in the Christian community, have prophetic Words and
scriptures contained with the Bible to guide us in our attempt to
understand, don't be shocked to find out that Islam does as well. For
them, scriptures are the words of the Qur'an and they have
their own prophetic words in writings called hadith.
Our imagery of the false prophet varies so much that some
portrayals show the man as a vicious wolf covered in sheepskin; and
yet, this is how Islam portrays Jesus, although they don't call Him
that, they call him the Dajjal.
Here is a short definition of what they perceive the Dajjal to be.
Dajjal
means "deceiver"
in Arabic.
In Islamic eschatology, Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal is an
evil false prophet
who, it is said, will come to earth and try to lure people into
following Shaytan (Satan). It is believed he will then be destroyed
by Christ or the Imam Mahdi.
The Dajjal, to Muslims, is the false prophet, which we believers
understand to be Jesus. How convenient that Jesus shows up about
the same time as the biblical end of the false prophet, and Islam's
Mahdi – the antichrist.
"And
I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse, and He who sat on it
is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, He judges and wages
war. His eyes are a flame of fire, and on His head are many diadems, and He has a name written on Him which no one knows except Himself.
He is clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The
Word of God. And the armies which are in heaven, clothed in fine
linen, white and clean, were following Him on white horses. From
His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may strike down the
nations, and He will rule them
with a rod of iron; and He treads the winepress of the fierce wrath
of God, the Almighty. And on His robe and on His thigh He has a name
written, "KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS."" (Revelation
19:11-16 NASB)
And the beast
[the
Antichrist]
was seized and with him the false prophet who performed the
signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who had received
the mark of the beast [An interesting fact is that the only one who
takes this mark will be those who DO NOT have their names written in
the book of Life.] and those who worshiped his image; these two were
thrown alive into the lake of fire which burns with brimstone.
(Revelation 19:20 NASB)
How
does the Bible describe the false prophet?
Then
I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had
two horns like a lamb and he spoke as a dragon.
(Revelation 13:11 NASB)
The fact that he had two horns like a lamb is indicative of him being
a representative of “godly teaching,” either that or a Jew. Keep
in mind, that the Bible sitting on your shelf, is a Jewish book and
is centered on the Jews. We, the church, are just a side note.
As I have pointed out in previous posts, there is a man that
already exists and fits this role. His name is Rabbi Baruch
Kahane, and he has been the high priest designate since 2016. When I
mention this and show the picture of the Rabbi, their response is,
he seems like a nice man.
This phrase “ he seems like a nice man” is exactly what the enemy
wants out of us, as it will be the catalyst for a great deception.
Think about this, scripture tells us that he has two horns like a
lamb. City folk, like myself, perceive the horns as a
bad thing not knowing that sheep are born with horns and
that the shepherds presumably cut them off to preserve the wool of
other sheep.
"For
false Christs and false prophets
will arise and will show great signs and wonders, so as to
mislead, if possible, even the elect.
(Matthew 24:24 NASB)
If, a loved man, like this, suddenly began performing great signs
and wonders, do you think it might be possible to draw Jewish teachers away from
their fragile relationships with God?
No doubt in my mind, although religious teachers, who ignore God's
words, portray this “misleading” differently and try to make you
think this is talking about you instead of God's chosen – the
Jewish leadership. Remember, there is always a context and it applies
to a time when the church, as the body of Christ, is gone. It would
be impossible to mislead the church if it has been caught away.
Secondly, this time is halfway through the seven years of God's wrath
upon Israel and the nations – the time seen as the time of the
antichrist.
Horns like a sheep are telling us that the false prophet is a
religious man.
Performing great signs only happens at the halfway point, and, up to this point has NOT been a regular part of the false prophet's functions. If this man, who becomes the false prophet, has been acting as the high priest, imagine the awe and respect he will have.
When it comes to signs and wonders, you have to keep in mind that there have been two witnesses from God, and they have been performing signs and testifying of God's greatness for three and one-half years. With their mission accomplished God allows for them to die. You have to realize that everyone has tried to kill them without success or harm. These two witnesses have been doing the very thing that this false prophet will do. It is not a question of mimicry, but it is exactly what Satan/the serpent/the dragon does, he perverts God's will and ways, and, as scripture shows us,
he is empowered by Satan just as the beast is.
Revelation
13:11-12 NASB
“Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had
two horns like a lamb and he spoke as a dragon. He
exercises all the authority of the first beast in his presence...”
Daniel
8:24 is speaking about the insolent king that will come when he says
this.
"His
power will be mighty, but not
by his own power,
And he will destroy to an extraordinary degree And prosper and
perform his will; He will destroy mighty men and the holy people.
(Daniel 8:24 NASB)
Since
you know that the false prophet exercises ALL THE AUTHORITY of the
first beast, then you should understand that it is the dragon that
gives the false prophet this authority. If
you want validation of what I just told you above, then read the
entirety of Revelation 13:11-17.
One last comment.
These two passages
that I initiated this study with are here to show you a purpose.
And
I saw coming out of the mouth of the dragon and out of the mouth of
the beast and out of the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean
spirits like frogs; for they are spirits of demons, performing signs,
which go out to the kings of the whole world, to gather them together
for the war of the great day of God, the Almighty.
(Revelation
16:13-14 NASB)
The entirety of
their purpose is to gather the kings of the whole world for the war
of the great day of God, the Almighty.
“kings”
is the Greek word basileus,
and according to Thayer's definitions also means leader
of the people, prince, commander, lord of the land.
It
would seem that everyone who thinks they have power is being drawn to
this battle.
The
terminology that the NASB uses is the phrase “the
war of the great day of God, the Almighty,”
Many focus on the term Armageddon and will deem this battle we see in
Revelation 16:14 to be that very battle.
If
you do a word search for the term Armageddon
the KJV produces one result, while the NASB gives us NO instances of
the term.
The Ultimate Cross-Reference Treasury
defines
Armageddon in this manner. It is called
The
hill of slaughter,
The
Mount of Decision or Sentence (Lange).
The
Meggido Valley,
A
symbol of defeat;
A
hill of victory.
Armageddon
is also known as, the Hill of Megiddo, where the Lord would avenge
the crime of the heathen (Gebhardt, p. 274, cited in Dusterdiek,
Note LXXX, p. 425)
I
will add that virtually every Biblical battle has been fought in this valley.
An example of this comes from the book of Judges.
"Kings came; they fought. Yes, the kings of Kena`an fought at Ta`anakh, by the waters of Megiddo;
but they took no spoil of silver. (Judges 5:19 CJB)
And that Megiddo is situated in the plain of Jezreel, which happens to be where David killed Goliath.
1
Samuel 29 tells us of how David, running from King Saul, went to
Achish and allied himself to him, in the land of Philistines, the
Jezreel valley.
Though
we are not there yet, the only place we find Armageddon in the
scriptures is in Revelation 16.
And
he shall gather them together into a place which in Hebrew is called
Armageddon.
(Revelation 16:16
DRB)
Notice
that it does not imply that you will find the word in the Old
Testament, merely because it says, “in Hebrew is called
Armageddon.”
So,
in the world of battles, we have the
Gog,
Magog war of Ezekiel 38,39
This will be a massive attack against Israel. It almost sounds as though this war has some nuclear weapons being launched, and God appears to launch fireballs against the enemies of Israel. This might happen moments before the rapture of the church, or a short time later;
it's hard to say.
The antichrist calls for peace, but keep in mind that Israel is not mentioned in that call. Three and half years later, the false prophet will launch a deadly war against believers and Jews. At some point
2/3 of Israel is killed or destroyed.
Revelation
19 tells us that Jesus returns at the end of the time of wrath. All those who chose to fight against Him will be killed. This battle also happens in the Jezreel valley, and there is where the blood will run as high as the horses' bridle.
After all this, we enter a thousand years of peace. While people stop fighting, considering that the nations, though limited in number,
will continue to live during this time and still have their free will choices. At least Satan will be bound and unable to affect their decision-making process. At the end of this thousand-year period, Satan will be released to deceive the nations one last time. They will rise up in a war against God and the Holy City, where most of us will live. This battle will also take place in the Jezreel valley.
With
this information and lack of scriptural witnesses, it seems that it
would be inappropriate to walk in confusion and call everything the
battle of Armageddon.
Hopefully, this helps.
Today
would be a great day to turn your life over to the Lord.