Showing posts with label blasphemy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blasphemy. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

A quick study on False Teachers. 2 Peter 2:1-3

I have had an up close and personal relationship with a false teacher for some time now. As usual, the Holy Spirit prompts me to see that far too many of us have to deal with people like this. Why would a false teacher be such a problem, especially since most of the influence asserted on us is minimal and annoying at best. For myself, I feel like I have wasted that portion of my day, and always have to do some quick research into the Word to debunk the garbage I, and the others had to listen to. Others ask outlandish questions, questions they would not ask if they spent anytime pursuing the Word of God. Sadly, the false teachers waste our time with garbage instead of the Word.

Having recently started a commentary on 2Peter I would have come to this discussion eventually, but for several days now, I feel compelled to do a quick study on false teachers. It would seem we are surrounded by them.

Also, I am not sure I understand what quick is either. If you do a phrase search in the NASB (my version of choice) there is only one reference to false teachers, and this is it:

2 Peter 2:1-3 But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. 2) Many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of the truth will be maligned; 3) and in their greed, they will exploit you with false words; their judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep.
Peter has projected this into the future, but if you know your Bible, then you know that false teachers came on the scene quickly. You may not see it, but there is a list presented here that describes the false teacher:
  • secretly introduce destructive heresies,”

Having a familiarity with someone who plays the role of false teacher, does he secretly introduce destructive heresies? First, let's look at the word secretly.

Secretly is the Greek word pareisago – which means to introduce surreptitiously; privily bring in. This tells me that under the guise of organized church policy and beliefs, he is teaching or advocating outside the scope of scripture or church doctrines.

The man I know told us that he was an ordained teacher in that particular religion. I knew they ordained Pastors, but teachers? The question is if they thought you were worthy of holding such a title many years ago, are you still adept enough to teach now?

Since joining the group over two years ago I became aware of false teachings. I know how many of you think and trust me, I was asked the same question; did you do or say anything about the teachings? Yes, on several occasions. At one point I left the group and was gone for about six months. A friend who still attended asked me to come back as I was one of the few who attempts to withstand the teacher. I assure you, I have not been called to aggressively confront deeply entrenched and admired Bible teachers; I also know my own personality and I have the propensity to be aggressive – a rather non-productive approach. Nothing changed, in fact, the teacher actually became more adamant in espousing his opinions.

The problems were many, and I attempted to inform the then new Pastor that someone needed to at least monitor the group. It seems that new pastors clean house by firing dissenting staff members, and that is exactly what we saw at this church. However, our renowned teacher is not a paid staff member and apparently of no concern. Two years have come and gone, and even though there is an esteemed church member and former deacon in attendance, to keep the study on the straight and narrow way of truth, he does and says nothing to correct blatant and horrendous falsehoods.

How then do we call it a secret and mutinous attempt if everyone keeps turning their backs and allowing the offender to go on teaching?
Destructive – Gk apōleia and means ruin or loss (physical, spiritual or eternal): - damnable (-nation), destruction, die, perdition, X perish, pernicious ways, waste.

The ruin, loss, destruction, and waste come in the form of misinformed participants who are either mislead or incapable of seeking out the truth. Why should they, as the false teacher has by intimidation implied that the information he gave was true and not to be challenged.

Heresies – Gk hairesis – meaning a choice, that is, (specifically) a party or (abstractly) disunion. The Word Study Dictionary says, a form of religious worship, discipline, or opinion.

One of the main things we hear from this teacher, especially after a Biblical refute of something he has espoused, is, that's my opinion, and that is all that matters. Oh really. In those moments he is clearly in disunion from the Word of God and the doctrines of the church. (As I side note: I often find myself annoyed by church doctrines as they tend to be the rules of man as they attempt to establish a hierarchy.)

  • even denying the Master who bought them,”
At first glance, this seems rather extreme, up to and including a denial of Jesus Christ. It's not quite that direct and requires you looking up the “simple” words.

Denying – Gk arneomai meaning to contradict, that is, disavow, reject, abnegate: - deny, refuse.
The actions and reactions described here are a common occurrence with this individual I am describing, as he contradicts, rejects, and refuses to hear the truth. (By the way, if you were to respond correctly to anything, it should be the truth. Truth in this example is exclusively the Word of God.)

It would seem that all you have to do is consider the words in question: “denying the Master who bought them.” Who brought us to this grand party? Jesus Christ, the Father God. So, in contradicting, disavowing, rejecting and refusal, you are doing just that, denying.

DISAVOW is to deny; to disown; to deny to be true, as a fact or charge respecting one's self; as, he was charged with embezzlement, but he disavows the fact. A man may disavow his name or signature; he may disavow a knowledge of a fact or his concern in a transaction.

If I operate on the principle that God's word is the truth, then to teach in opposition to that Word is to disavow.

  • Many will follow their sensuality,”
Follow – Gk exakoloutheō meaning to follow, to imitate:
Such a simple word, follow, but if we all emulated the practices, lifestyle, and teachings of the false teacher, then we become his imitators, as we live our stunted lives (A huge implication here is, that few of us have the ability to read the Bible and understand it.)

How pathetically sad this idea of following someone like this. Jesus is the one I am aware of who advocated people following Him, although I am sure even Paul the Apostle wrote and told others to emulate him as well.

To follow all aspects of the false teacher I speak of would leave me seriously stunted, judgmental, and legalistic.

Sensuality – Gk aselgeia meaning licentiousness or wantonness.

As I try to understand I am lead to this word licentiousness, and I can't find it in my memory banks; that is why I look things up.

LICEN'TIOUSNESS, n. Excessive indulgence of liberty; contempt of the just restraints of law, morality, and decorum. The licentiousness of authors is justly condemned; the licentiousness of the press is punishable by law.

Anyone who has sat under this brother in Christ knows that he exhibits both of these things traits, every week.

  • and because of them the way of the truth will be maligned;”
Maligned; what a pathetically simple way of saying blasphemed. The Gk word is blasphēmeō meaning to slander, hence to speak lightly or profanely of sacred things:

Slander is defined as A false tale or report maliciously uttered and tending to injure the reputation of another by lessening him in the esteem of his fellow citizens, by exposing him to impeachment and punishment, or by impairing his means of living;

Wow, in Christianity, and among false teachers, the idea of blaspheming the Holy Spirit, and thereby committing the unpardonable sin, is tossed around with frequency. Jesus gave us the clearest and most defined example when He went after a group of Pharisees. The setting: He had just delivered a young man of a demon when the Pharisees began their verbal attacks, saying, He casts them out by the power of the Devil, the enemy. His response:

Mark 3:22-30 The scribes who came down from Jerusalem were saying, "He is possessed by Beelzebul," and "He casts out the demons by the ruler of the demons." 23) And He called them to Himself and began speaking to them in parables, "How can Satan cast out Satan? 24) "If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. 25) "If a house is divided against itself, that house will not be able to stand. 26) "If Satan has risen up against himself and is divided, he cannot stand, but he is finished! 27) "But no one can enter the strong man's house and plunder his property unless he first binds the strong man, and then he will plunder his house. 28) "Truly I say to you, all sins shall be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter; 29) but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin"-- 30) because they were saying, "He has an unclean spirit."

Did you catch that? All this was said in response because “they were saying, "He has an unclean spirit."”

Typically, the word blasphemy is used as a method of control (Control, if you do your homework, is a form of witchcraft.) Just for the fun of it, let's see what God has to say about witchcraft.

Deuteronomy 18:9-12 9) "When you enter the land which the LORD your God gives you, you shall not learn to imitate the detestable things of those nations. 10) "There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, one who uses divination, one who practices witchcraft, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, 11) or one who casts a spell, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. 12) "For whoever does these things is detestable to the LORD; and because of these detestable things the LORD your God will drive them out before you.

Let me ask you a simplistic, childlike question. What is truth? The answer to the question is, God's Word is Truth; plain and simple. So, does God win over the opinion of any man? Without a doubt.

  • and in their greed, they will exploit you with false words;”
Greed is the Greek word pleonexia and means advantage, covetousness.

The word greed tends to force you to look for the money, but that is far from where we need to be thinking right now. I realize this can be a problem for television evangelists and some pastors, but this is just a small town “Bible Study” leader, and he does not get paid.

Because the word advantage is an alternate understanding of the Gk word pleonexia, let's see what the definition of advantage is.

ADV'ANTAGE, n.1. Any state, condition, or circumstance, favorable to success, prosperity, interest, or reputation.

Wait a minute; this man had a reputation; and, he certainly wants to be seen as a success, and, he wants the conditions to be favorable to achieving that goal. But keep in mind that the verse says, “they will exploit you with false words.

Allow me to give you a grand example of what we hear with consistency.

The generalized statement was made that, everyone that goes to the great white throne is sent to the hell they deserve. Is this a true statement? Absolutely not. How do I know that? Because I have read my Bible; I have a brain, and I choose to use it.

The Great White Throne judgment. Do you realize it only shows up in two locations; one of those is here:

Revelation 20:11-15 Then I saw a great white throne and Him who sat upon it, from whose presence earth and heaven fled away, and no place was found for them. 12) And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, and books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged from the things which were written in the books, according to their deeds. 13) And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead which were in them; and they were judged, every one of them according to their deeds. 14) Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. 15) And if anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.

False teachers will dare to assume that no one's name is found written in the book of life and therefore thrown into the lake of fire, but that is not conveyed in Revelation 20:11-15. It merely tells you what is to befall those He does not find listed in the books. It says that the dead, from all time apparently, are raised and brought before this throne. God then, opens the books, and there are several, and He scours those books looking for some act for which He can show mercy. Sadly, for some unfortunate few, He finds nothing, and they are sent to their permanent place of separation.

Now, I said there were two places we find this throne. The second is in Matthew 25. The NASB entitles this section, “The Final Judgment.” Wow, that should have a familiar ring to it, especially since I just gave you the paraphrased version of the final judgment.

Matthew 25:31-46 "But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne. 32) "All the nations will be gathered before Him; and He will separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats; 33) and He will put the sheep on His right, and the goats on the left. 34) "Then the King will say to those on His right, 'Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. 35) 'For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; 36) naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.' 37) "Then the righteous will answer Him, 'Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You something to drink? 38) 'And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? 39) 'When did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?' 40) "The King will answer and say to them, 'Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.' 41) "Then He will also say to those on His left, 'Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels; 42) for I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; 43) I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me.' 44) "Then they themselves also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not take care of You?' 45) "Then He will answer them, 'Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.' 46) "These will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."
So how is this similar to what we saw in Revelation 20?
  • Matthew 25 states,“But when the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then He will sit on His glorious throne.”
  • Revelation 20 tells us, “Then I saw a great white throne and Him who sat upon it,”
There is only one Him, and His name is Jesus. This is relatively easy to ascertain if you keep in mind that the Revelation is a revelation of Jesus Christ. So when we see God in the Revelation we are seeing Jesus.
  • In Matthew 25:32 "All the nations will be gathered before Him.”
Here they are not specifically designated as dead or formerly dead folk. I think this throws many off as they cannot extrapolate. Why should this concept of the dead be a problem anyway; especially since we are all eternal in our spirits - that thing made after the image of God.
  • In Revelation 20 we see this: “I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, .. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead which were in them.
These dead came from everywhere imaginable; the sea, and death and Hades gave up the dead which was in them. One of the problems people have when trying to make this comparison is the idea that only live people are brought to the throne in Matthew 25. Is it a critical error if God's word fails to give you what you think is a scathing omission? Dead or alive, we are all alive eternally in our spirits; we were, by the way, made in the image of God and He is a spirit. So, in the long run, no one is really dead in the sense of answering for our transgression's, are we.

Here is an excellent question and worthy of some thought, especially since it helps our understanding. Since this is the end of time who are the people, we are dealing with as we try to understand those before the throne?

Since the church age, there have only been three people groups. (Note: God does not care where you are from or what color you are. They are:)
  • The Jews/Israel;
  • The Church – the church is the living breathing organism made up of us, and we, are in Christ.
  • And, the nations – those outside of a relationship with Jesus Christ,
A piece of information you theoretically should know, unless of course your time was squandered by a false teacher who made you endure some derisory teaching about backsliding for two months, is that by this time the church will have been caught up to heaven, leaving those Jews that were not part of the church to endure the wrath that is coming. Sadly many who sit in churches will miss out on this catching away and have to endure the wrath as well. Those outside of the first two groups; and remain, are primarily called the nations. The nations are a diverse group that can include religious people, cannibals, brutal bullies, the poor, and the rich.

In terms of timing, the millennial reign has come to an end. Satan is released long enough to deceive the nations - once again, and they surround the 1500 square mile City of God along with its people, thinking that they can kill God. God sends a fire and destroys this uncountable number. It is at this time when the Great White Throne is set up. If I focus on Matthew's account, there is a clear separation of acceptable folks from the bad, with the bad sent off to an eternal hell. Many are shown mercy simply on the basis of some kind act. Revelation 20 is where false teachers like to focus and will advocate that all go to hell, all the while ignoring that God is scouring through these books to find a reason to show mercy. If God, who knows all and sees all, knew who would be destined to hell why then even have books. In Matthew's account, the crowd is separated and seemingly without the aid of these books. This kind of merciless logic conveys a God that merely mocks those destined for hell since He already knows their names and whether they are in the books or not. 
No, God is looking for a reason to show mercy.

Friday, August 4, 2017

"a god whom his fathers did not know" Daniel 11:34-45 , a commentary.

This is an area that has no direct correlation with History. It is also the darkest waters as most assign things like worshipping "a god whom his fathers did not know," to the most unusual of theories. 
If I consider all the influences, most of which are Assyrian, then I can begin to understand what something like the idea of worshipping a god his fathers did not know, a little less difficult. 
Read on and you will see what I mean.

Antiochus is resisted by the Maccabees who do exploits but are oppressed by him many days.

Daniel 11:34 NASB "Now when they fall they will be granted a little help, and many will join with them in hypocrisy.
  • Now, when they fall, they will be granted a little help.”
Since we understand that the price to be paid for coming to the Lord during the last days is ultimately death, help can only be fleeting. I cannot begin to imagine what a little help will look like, but the implications are that it is momentary and temporary.
  • and many will join with them in hypocrisy.”
Hypocrisy, as defined in the Hebrew, describes uncertain people on treacherous paths of false prophets (Jeremiah 23:12) and hated enemies.

These two possibilities I see here.
  • Islam has the right to lie. They can and will play the role of a follower in order to gain an advantage in Jihad.
  • The other is help coming from people that really aren't going to stick around. In either case, you will probably die.
Jeremiah 23:12 NASB "Therefore their way will be like slippery paths to them, They will be driven away into the gloom and fall down in it; For I will bring calamity upon them, The year of their punishment," declares the LORD.

Daniel 11:35 CJB Even some of those with discernment will stumble so that some of them will be refined, purified and cleansed for an end yet to come at the designated time.


  • Even some of those with discernment will stumble.”
    We always want the good guy to win, however, that is not always the case, and there is a reason why.

     

  • so that some of them will be refined, purified and cleansed

    What is the reason for the “great tribulation”?
    It is God's final punishment of: Israel, for their rejection of Him, and it is a punishment of the world for accosting his people and their rejection of Him.

    If Israel has rejected Him all these years, is it possible that God is looking for a method of redemption, instead of a final punishment, as some believe?
    What if you found out that God's character and nature were mercy and love?

     

  •  for an end yet to come at the designated time.
What is the end?
Truly, it can only be the Great White Throne judgment. This event shows up in two places; one in the Revelation and the other in Matthew 25 where we see the sheep and the goats. In Revelation Jesus is played out before us as what appears to be an angry God. We get that impression for all we see is the finality of His judgment as many are sent to the lake of fire, a place that was only designed for Satan and his mutinous crew.

In Matthew's account, Jesus is the gentle shepherd and we primarily focus on the sheep and their reward. In either case, you become aware of books along with the book of life. I surmise that God scours those books looking desperately for some reason to show those standing before Him mercy.

The time of the vision.

The character of "the king" of the north (Daniel 7:25 and 8:25.)

Daniel 11:36 CJB "The king will do as he pleases. He will exalt himself and consider himself greater than any god, and he will utter monstrous blasphemies against the God of gods. He will prosper only until the period of wrath is over, for what has been determined must take place.
  • The king will do as he pleases”

    What permits such actions?
    An overwhelming fear; support of loyal troops; a lack of oversight.
    So, is that typical?
    Perhaps not, but not impossible.

     

  • He will exalt himself and consider himself greater than any god, and he will utter monstrous blasphemies against the God of gods”

    It seems that many people think this way. However, this is much more serious than the standard blasphemies of which we speak. The entity that does this specific thing is the Antichrist.

    2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 CJB Don't let anyone deceive you in any way. For the Day will not come until after the Apostasy has come and the man who separates himself from Torah has been revealed, the one destined for doom. 4) He will oppose himself to everything that people call a god or make an object of worship; he will put himself above them all, so that he will sit in the Temple of God and proclaim that he himself is God.


  • He will prosper only until the period of wrath is over, for what has been determined must take place.”

    Revelation 11:18 NASB "And the nations were enraged, and Your wrath came, and the time came for the dead to be judged, and the time to reward Your bond-servants the prophets and the saints and those who fear Your name, the small and the great, and to destroy those who destroy the earth."

    The determined time is his end.
Revelation 19:20 NASB "And the beast was seized, and with him, the false prophet who performed the signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who had received the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image; these two were thrown alive into the lake of fire which burns with brimstone."

Daniel 11:37 NASB "He will show no regard for the gods of his fathers or for the desire of women, nor will he show regard for any other god; for he will magnify himself above them all."
  • He will show no regard for the gods of his fathers”
Antiochus's Seleucid predecessors had elevated the god Apollo, while the Ptolemies had shown a preference for Adonis (possibly referred to here as the one desired by women). Antiochus neglects them (though by no means rejects them) in favor of Olympian Zeus. The fact that he designated himself as God Manifest on his coins is sufficient to explain the comment in this verse. IVPBBC
  • or for the desire of women”

    Based on this, some Bible scholars believe that the Antichrist will be of Jewish descent, and perhaps will also be a homosexual. These things may not be popularly known about the man, but they may be true nonetheless. But many commentators believe that the desire of women refers to Jesus, in that all women desired the honor of bearing the Messiah and understanding “desire” as it is used in Haggai 2:7. Seeing the desire of women as Jesus makes the most sense in light of the flow of context. David Guzik's Enduring Word Commentary
Daniel 11:38 NASB "But instead he will honor a god of fortresses, a god whom his fathers did not know; he will honor him with gold, silver, costly stones and treasures.
  • But instead he will honor a god of fortresses, a god whom his fathers did not know;”

    The Antichrist will take and hold power with military might and the shrewd use of great riches.” Guzik
Certainly, Islam is and has been the people of the sword, so violence is a way of life to them. But where are the fortresses? The fortresses seem to be more in their Mosques and run by the Caliphates.

Daniel 11:39 NASB "He will take action against the strongest of fortresses with the help of a foreign god; he will give great honor to those who acknowledge him and will cause them to rule over the many, and will parcel out land for a price.

The following is from the Albert Barnes' Notes on the Bible

Thus shall he do in, the most strong holds - Margin, “fortresses of munitions.” The reference is to strongly fortified places; of those places which had been made strong for purposes of defense. The idea is that he would carry on his purposes against these places, as it were, under the auspices of this strange god. It was a fact that in his wars, Antiochus came into possession of the strong places or the fortified towns of the nations which he attacked - Jerusalem, Sidon, Peluslum, Memphis - then among the strongest places in the world.

But we are looking forward to an end-time scenario, and there are few fortresses anymore. Oh, I am not excluding the idea that there are military bases, nor am I discounting countries like Russia and Iran, which seem to operate as though they were fortresses unto themselves.
  • with the help of a foreign god”

    A foreign god whom his fathers did not acknowledge;” We have already spoken about how Antiochus IV ignored the gods of his family and brought in Zeus from the Romans. But, we are looking forward and need to look outside the box. Who or what is the god of Islam? Allah. This would certainly push this person outside the realm of his father's gods.
  • he will give great honor to those who acknowledge him and will cause them to rule over the many”
While in the short term, “the conquests of Antiochus would seem to be a setting up of the dominion of these gods over the lands which he subdued.” But in the long term, Islam demands submission to Allah. 

And shall divide the land for gain - “The reference here is, probably, to the holy land, and the idea is that it would be partitioned out among his followers for a price, or with a view to gain; that is, perhaps, that it would be “farmed out” for the purpose of raising revenue, and that with this view, as often occurred, it would be set up for sale to the highest bidder. This was a common way of raising revenue, by “farming out” a conquered province; that is, by disposing of the privilege of raising a revenue in it to the one who would offer most for it, and the consequence was, that it gave rise to vast rapacity in extorting funds from the people. Compare 1 Macc. 3:35, 36, where, speaking of Lysias, whom Antiochus had “set to oversee the affairs of the king from the river Euphrates unto the borders of Egypt,” it is said of Antiochus that he “gave him (Lysias) charge of all things that he would have done, as also concerning them that dwelt in Judea and Jerusalem: to wit, that he should send an army against them, to destroy and root out the strength of Israel, and the remnant of Jerusalem, and to take away their memorial from that place; and that he should place strangers in all their quarters, ‘and divide their land by lot. ‘“

The final battles of Daniel 11:40-45

There is no known historical sequence corresponding to that which is laid out in these verses. Antiochus IV was killed in battle in Persia in December 164. Many interpreters of Daniel consider this section (perhaps starting as early as v. Dan_11:36) to contain a reference to a much more distant future.

War between Syria (north) and Egypt (south) at the end time: Antichrist (Syria, North) is victorious over Egypt (south) and many countries up to the middle of Daniel's seventieth week when the "eighth" or Revived Grecian Empire is formed. (Dan 7:24; 8:23-25; Rev 11:7; 13:1-18; 16:10; 17:3, 8-14, 16-17; 19:19-21)

Daniel 11:40 NASB "At the end time the king of the South will collide with him, and the king of the North will storm against him with chariots, with horsemen, and with many ships; and he will enter countries, overflow them and pass through.
  • At the end time, the king of the South will collide with him”
These kings are to be understood in reference to the times in which the prophet speaks. While the kingdoms of Egypt and Syria were subsisting, the king of the south and the north applied to them exclusively: but they did not exist at the time of which the prophet speaks; therefore, other southern and northern powers must be sought. These we may find in the Saracens, who were of the Arabians, who came from the south, headed by the false prophet Mohammed, who pushed at him - made war on the Greek emperor Heraclius, and with amazing rapidity deprived him of Egypt, Syria, and many of his finest provinces. [Adam Clarke]
  • and the king of the North will storm against him with chariots, with horsemen, and with many ships”
Pastor Dave Guzik says, “The Turks, who were originally Scythians, seized on the remains of the Greek empire; and in process of time rendered themselves masters of the whole. They are represented as coming like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen; their armies being chiefly composed of cavalry.”
An aspect we need to remind ourselves of is that the Bible is Israel and Middle-east centric. With Jerusalem as the center, the North passes straight through Aleppo, Syria, Ankara, Turkey, and finally through Moscow, Russia. It is likely that Turkey is the focus here, but I am not sure that Turkey has the naval power to fulfill the many ships aspect.
  • and he will enter countries, overflow them and pass through.”

    Having both the North and the South come against him would under normal circumstances mean the end for most. The word overflow also carries the meanings of rinsed, wash away, and to overwhelm. Here I am talking about the possibilities that this is Muslim leader and that might be, but I do not think it is in the strictest sense. Moscow is Russian, and, even though there is a Muslim influence, the animosity is great. Turkey, on the other hand, is not only Islamic but their leader, Erdogan Princip, thinks of himself as the last Mahdi, potentially filling the role of the Antichrist. Should the Muslim world throw itself behind him, there would be little to stand in his way.
New adversaries in the north and east in the middle of the week after he has conquered and acquired control of the ten kingdoms of Revised Rome. He conquers these in the last three and a half years and then brings them into Palestine to destroy Israel as he intended to do in the middle of the week when he broke the covenant with them and planted his tabernacle in the glorious holy mountain.

Daniel 11:41 NASB "He will also enter the Beautiful Land, and many countries will fall, but these will be rescued out of his hand: Edom, Moab, and the foremost of the sons of Ammon.
  • He will also enter the Beautiful Land, and many countries will fall”
Any student of end-times events understands that the beast/antichrist persona will enter Jerusalem. What we don't seem to see is that other countries will fall as well. It truly seems that we are seeing prophecy played out before our eyes as several countries in the Middle East have had their leaders taken down and their countries left in piles of rubble. Syria is an ongoing process as we speak. Just because many of us live in the United States of America, we think we will be secure. I no longer think that will be the case.
  • but these will be rescued out of his hand: Edom, Moab and the foremost of the sons of Ammon.”

    Why? That is a good question but it requires background knowledge and the prophetic look into the future. If we start with the fact that Edom was/is the eldest son of Isaac, that in itself answers nothing pertaining to the question as to why God will rescue them. Perhaps the answer is somewhat buried and requires diligence to sort it out.

    • The Prophet Isaiah tells us,

      Isaiah 11:14-15 NET. They will swoop down on the Philistine hills to the west; together they will loot the people of the east. They will take over Edom and Moab, and the Ammonites will be their subjects. 15) The LORD will divide the gulf of the Egyptian Sea; he will wave his hand over the Euphrates River and send a strong wind, he will turn it into seven dried-up streams, and enable them to walk across in their sandals.

      They,” in this passage, seems to be Judah. Judah was the Northern kingdom and seemed to be the bad seed. This is where we find King Ahab and his wife Jezebel. She also plays a significant role in end times events, as her name is associated with the Harlot (a rather surreal socio-economic empire) that rides the beast.

      Revelation 17:3 Moffatt NT 3) So he bore me away rapt in the Spirit to the desert, and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet Beast covered with blasphemous titles; it had seven heads and ten horns.

      Revelation 17:16 MKJV and the ten horns which you saw on the beast, these will hate the harlot and will make her desolate and naked. And they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire.

      So what we can ascertain from all this is that God deems Edom, Moab, and the Ammonites to have been punished enough and releases them from punishment.
Daniel 11:42 MKJV And he shall stretch out his hand on the lands. And the land of Egypt shall not escape.
  • He, of course, is this person. While Antiochus Epiphanes may have done this, it applies to the near future as well. Egypt will not escape.
Ezekiel 29:14-15 NASB "I will turn the fortunes of Egypt and make them return to the land of Pathros, to the land of their origin, and there they will be a lowly kingdom. 15) "It will be the lowest of the kingdoms, and it will never again lift itself up above the nations. And I will make them so small that they will not rule over the nations.

Daniel 11:43 CJB he will control the treasures of gold and silver, as well as everything else in Egypt of value. Put, and Ethiopia will be subject to him.

We already went over Daniel 11:28 but note how it says, “Then the king of the north will return to his own land with great wealth;” CJB

Albert Barnes's commentary states, “Enriched with the spoils of Egypt. Having taken Memphis and the fairest portions of Egypt, he would, of course, carry great wealth to his own country on his return. Thus it is said in 1 Macc. 1:19: “Thus they got the strong cities in the land of Egypt, and he took the spoils thereof.”

Sadly, because they are Apocryphal books, we ignore the historical aspects of books like 1Maccabees, which confirms that this person spoils the strong cities of the land of Egypt. This includes Chad, Sudan, Somalia, Lybia, Nigeria, and anything along the northern coast of Africa.

Daniel 11:44 CJB However, news from the east and north will frighten him so that he moves out in great fury to ruin and completely do away with many.
  • Everything we have seen so far points to a ruler in his attempts at global domination, but even that seems to evade him.
  • Extend a line to the farthest eastern coastlands, and you will be in China. Since China is not Muslim-friendly, perhaps this plays a role.
  • Merely because his goal is to do away with many does not mean he will be successful.
Daniel 11:45 CJB Finally, when he pitches the tents of his palace between the seas and the mountain of the holy Glory, he will come to his end with no one to help him.
  • Tents, or as the KJV translates it, tabernacles. It is the Hebrew word 'ôhel and means a tent (as clearly conspicuous from a distance.)
  • of his palace - ’appeḏen: A masculine noun indicating tent structure, a tented palace, pavilion.
    What can I ascertain from this?
    • He is establishing a palace.
    • It, at this point, is temporary.
    • It is meant to be seen as; either that or he is attempting to be an affront to God.
    • And that this is his last resting place on earth.
      How do I know that?
  • he will come to his end, with no one to help him.”

    The next thing we see is Christ returning with His saints to slaughter everyone that chooses to fight against Him. The NASB entitles this explanatory section of the Bible, The Marriage Supper of the Lamb.

    The epic battle begins in Revelation 19:6 and in Revelation 19:9 the speaker says to John the beloved, “Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.”

    Verse 19:11 initiates the Rider on the white horse and there is little doubt that we are seeing Jesus upon this horse. Verse 13 indicates that His name is called, The Word of God.

    In verse 14 He is followed by the armies of Heaven, also riding on white horses.

    These have one purpose, which we find in verse 15: “That He may strike down the nations, and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty.

      • Revelation 19:19-21 NASB 19) And I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies assembled to make war against Him who sat on the horse and against His army. 20) And the beast was seized, and with him, the false prophet who performed the signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who had received the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image; these two were thrown alive into the lake of fire which burns with brimstone. 21) And the rest were killed with the sword which came from the mouth of Him who sat on the horse, and all the birds were filled with their flesh.
And thus ends chapter 11. This idea of a far distant future is not so far-fetched as Daniel chapter 12 continues on with, "Now at that time Michael, the great prince who stands guard over the sons of your people, will arise. And there will be a time of distress such as never occurred since there was a nation until that time; and at that time your people, everyone who is found written in the book, will be rescued.” NASB

Thursday, August 25, 2016

A short course in Isaiah. Chapter 13 - The message about Babylon.

Now this is where it gets interesting.
Isaiah 13:1 NET. This is a message about Babylon that God revealed to Isaiah, son of Amoz:
My first question is, what do we know about Isaiah?
While this may not seem important to others, I believe that knowing something of Isaiah's background might answer important questions and possibly give me an understanding about this religious garbage that was thrown at me, in an attempt to convince me that Isaiah quoted from some Babylonian mythology. I suppose then that we should not take the things Isaiah said so seriously. As a side note: If I can discredit Isaiah in one area, then perhaps he should be disregarded in all other aspects as well, such as chapter 53 where he describes the horrendous price the Messiah would pay.
Pastor John MacArthur tells us that, “Isaiah is quoted directly in the NT over sixty-five times, more than any other OT prophet, and mentioned by name over twenty times.” That tells me that others thought highly of Isaiah's words.
  • Isaiah, the son of Amoz, ministered in and around Jerusalem as a prophet to Judah during the reigns of four kings of Judah: Uzziah (called "Azariah" in 2 Kin.), Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah (Isa_1:1), from c. 739-686 B.C. Moment of clarity: Judah was the Southern Kingdom, and Israel was the Northern Kingdom.
  • He evidently came from a family of some rank, because he had easy access to the king (Isaiah 7:3).
  • He was married and had two sons who bore symbolic names: Shear-jashub ("a remnant shall return," Isaiah 7:3) and Maher-shalal-hash-baz ("hasting to the spoil, hurrying to the prey," Isaiah 8:3).
  • When called by God to prophesy in the year of King Uzziah's death (c. 739 B.C.), he responded with a cheerful readiness, though he knew from the beginning that his ministry would be one of fruitless warning and exhortation (Isaiah 6:9-13).
  • Isaiah prophesied at the same time as Hosea and Micah.

What is Babylon?

If you are so inclined, do a word search for Babylon, you will find that it shows up 297 times throughout scripture.
Its origins began before the flood in Noah's days. Apparently rebuilt by Noah's descendants, it appears in the book of Joshua where Achan, against orders, took some of the spoil (silver and gold) and hid them in his tent. 
Joshua 7:21 NASB when I saw among the spoil a beautiful mantle from Shinar and two hundred shekels of silver and a bar of gold fifty shekels in weight, then I coveted them and took them;..”
What other information, perhaps historically, do we have that associate and identifies the Shinar plane as being a part of Babylon.
Shinar - A region in Mesopotamia, the plain between the Tigris and the Euphrates. Here the rebels against God's will built the Babel tower (Gen_11:2-3). Derived from sheni "two" and 'ar or nahar "rivers."
What is surprising, perhaps even shocking about this scenario is what Achan said as he described what he did; I coveted them and took them!
As you read through the Bible, you find a deep hatred between the religious Jews (Pharisees) and the Samaritans. The Samaritans – as they came to be known, had originally been the Israelite kingdom. Since both the Southern and Northern Kingdoms eventually went into Assyrian captivity, it became evident to the Assyrians that they needed to repopulate the region of Samaria.
2 Kings 17:24 LITV And the king of Assyria brought men in from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and Sepharvaim, and made them live in the cities of Samaria instead of the sons of Israel, and they possessed Samaria and lived in its cities.
An obvious factor to God and a few astute others was that these were all Gentiles (Goyim), and they did not fear Jehovah.
2 Kings 17:25-26 LITV And it happened at the beginning of their living there, they did not fear Jehovah, and Jehovah sent lions among them, and they were striking among them. 26) And they spoke to the king of Assyria, saying, The nations that you have exiled and have made to live in the cities of Samaria do not know the custom of the God of the land, and He has sent the lions into their midst; and, behold, they are killing them, since they do not know the custom of the God of the land.
So the Assyrian king sees what he believes to be the solution and places a Jewish priest back in Samaria to reteach these people the Hebrew customs and laws. How did it all work out?
2 Kings 17:32-34 LITV So it was that they feared Jehovah, and made for themselves, of the lowest of them, priests of the high places and they sacrificed for them in the houses of the high places. 33) They feared Jehovah, and served their own gods, according to the custom of the nations from where they exiled them. 34) To this day they do according to the former custom; they do not fear Jehovah, and do not do according to their statutes, and according to their ordinances, and according to the Law, and according to the commandment that Jehovah commanded the sons of Jacob, on whom He set His name, Israel.
  • they feared Jehovah.”
    The word fear can either mean to be afraid of, or to reverence. Since Israel seemed to do neither, I am not sure what this is trying to convey.
  • and made for themselves, of the lowest of them, priests of the high places and they sacrificed for them in the houses of the high places.”
    There were no "high" places in the temple worship, so this had everything to do the creation of places where they could worship their own gods and offer sacrifices to them.
  • They feared Jehovah, and served their own gods, according to the custom of the nations from where they exiled them.”
    Oh sure, we know Him, but this is what we do. We brought it from our country and these priests we have here, they say it's okay.
I seem to have shot by this rather quickly, and I want you to see something here. One of the first things that Israel did after leaving Egypt was to coerce Aaron into making them a copy of the god Moloch. We love to call it merely, the golden calf. But all these years later, the most religious would not speak of the horror involved in this incident. Stephen, in the book of Acts, as a part of his defense before the council, pointed out that one of the gods Israel was worshiping was Moloch, a god that demanded child sacrifice by roasting them alive. No one challenged him. It does not take a genius to figure out that God values the lives of children, and yet, still today, in this modern world we live in, we are still sacrificing children to some god and calling it a different name.
2 Kings 17:30-31 NASB The men of Babylon made Succoth-benoth, the men of Cuth made Nergal, the men of Hamath made Ashima, 31) and the Avvites made Nibhaz and Tartak; and the Sepharvites burned their children in the fire to Adrammelech and Anammelech the gods of Sepharvaim.
We are still trying to define Babylon, although somewhat loosely,
If I could think of Babylon as a physical location only, then this would explain its origins to some degree.
Genesis 10:8-11 NET. Cush was the father of Nimrod; he began to be a valiant warrior on the earth. 9) He was a mighty hunter before the LORD. (That is why it is said, "Like Nimrod, a mighty hunter before the LORD.") 10) The primary regions of his kingdom were Babel, Erech, Akkad, and Calneh in the land of Shinar. 11) From that land he went to Assyria, where he built Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah,
We run into several problems as we read our sterilized translations of the Bible.
Nimrod; he began to be a valiant warrior on the earth.”
  • Nimrod was a gibbôr, and many times translated giant. However, 1 Samuel 17:51 (NASB) translated the word as champion.
    Then David ran and stood over the Philistine and took his sword and drew it out of its sheath and killed him, and cut off his head with it. When the Philistines saw that their champion was dead, they fled.”
    If I take the liberty to reinsert the Hebrew, it reads like this: “When the Philistines saw that their gibbôr was dead, they fled.” You might even read it as: “When the Philistines saw that their giant was dead.” Ask yourself, what is the common understanding as to what Goliath was? A giant of a man, at least nine feet tall.
  • he began to be” comes from the Hebrew words chalal H2490c and hâyâh H1961.chalal; a primary root; to pollute, defile, profane.
    hayah (224a); a prim. root; to fall out, come to pass, become,
    It becomes evident that Nimrod changed. If he had a comprehension of who God was, he was swiftly defiling everything God stood for.
  • a valiant warrior.”This is where we come to understand that Nimrod was a giant. But, the Hebrew word gibbôr also carries a much more sinister definition: powerfulby implication a warriortyrant.
  • The primary regions of his kingdom were Babel, Erech, Akkad, and Calneh in the land of Shinar.
    Where did I begin this explanation of Babylon? With an incident that originates in the plains of Shinar.
    Joshua 7:21 NASB when I saw among the spoil a beautiful mantle from Shinar and two hundred shekels of silver and a bar of gold fifty shekels in weight, then I coveted them and took them;..”
    • Note the other name that appears here, Babel. This is the early origins of the name Babylon.
      When we associate the name Babylon with its originator, then we find people whom, in general, are willing to pollute, defile, and profane God, while intentionally falling away from Him.
  • From that land, he went to Assyria, where he built Nineveh,”
    Now there is a familiar name to even the simplest of Bible students. Jonah, the prophet was told by God to go there and say, repent or destruction from God will come upon you. Jonah tried to commit suicide to prevent speaking to the Ninevites because he knew God would show them mercy. This becomes evident at the end of the story. What you have to ask is why Jonah felt this way. That is some fairly intense hatred he has.

In attempting to understand Babylon, what have we learned so far?

  • Babel was founded by a savagely violent giant named Nimrod, a man who turned his back on God, by polluting, and defiling God's name. Those who followed Nimrod built the tower at Babel, and because of the things involved with that action God eventually destroys all mankind, except for Noah's little family, with a global flood.
  • Babylon became symbolic, and Israel gains that reference on several occasions.
  • A global governing body now represents the effective representation of Babylon. The people at the top of this pyramid, much like those that worship Moloch, care nothing about sacrificing children and the have-nots while setting themselves up as godlike entities.

And one last thing about Babylon.

Jeremiah 50:12-13 NASB Your mother will be greatly ashamed, She who gave you birth will be humiliated. Behold, she will be the least of the nations, A wilderness, a parched land and a desert. 13) "Because of the indignation of the LORD she will not be inhabited, But she will be completely desolate; Everyone who passes by Babylon will be horrified And will hiss because of all her wounds.
she will be the least of the nations, A wilderness, a parched land and a desert. 13) "Because of the indignation of the LORD she will not be inhabited, But she will be completely desolate;”
We know where Babylon is; Saddam Hussein was attempting to rebuild it before the war, but it is no less bleak, and only a small number of people live there. So, I think we can accurately say; we are no longer looking for the rebirth of a city.
If you are thinking, what about the empires Babylon represented, you might be closer to understanding; however, most people, regarding empires, seem to stop with the Babylonian. While it is true that Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonian King, took the Hebrews (both kingdoms – Israel in the north, and Judah in the South) captive, he was an Assyrian king. The kingdoms that followed, as spoken of in Daniel and demonstrated by the statue explained by Daniel, show that the Medes and Persians became the dominant force. How much evil can we assign to the Medes and Persians, at this time, when Daniel was still given positions of power and authority under Darius the Mede, and Cyrus the Persian. The empires we need to give consideration to initiate with the Grecian empire under Alexander, as he controlled significant land masses and those play a role in future events.
I get it! This is called a short course in Isaiah, and we just spent two and a half pages on Babylon. What's up with that. Look at verse one of the thirteenth chapter once again.
Isaiah 13:1 NET. This is a message about Babylon that God revealed to Isaiah, son of Amoz:
In this instance, it is a message about Babylon. Awe yes, but this story takes a serious 180 and quickly.
Isaiah 13:2-3 ESV On a bare hill raise a signal; cry aloud to them; wave the hand for them to enter the gates of the nobles. 3) I myself have commanded my consecrated ones, and have summoned my mighty men to execute my anger, my proudly exulting ones.
I myself have commanded my consecrated ones”
So far it sounds okay. I am always rooting for the good guys, and I might be assuming this is directed at the bad guys. But what is this?
to enter the gates of the nobles.”
Job 21:28 NASB "For you say, 'Where is the house of the nobleman, And where is the tent, the dwelling places of the wicked?'
The word nobleman is the Hebrew word nâdı̂yb / naw-deeb'; properly voluntary, generous; as noun, a grandee (sometimes a tyrant):
Since the Hebrew conveys the possibility of a tyrant, and it is easy to ascertain that Nimrod was a tyrant, we might be able to say that what we see in Isaiah 12:2,3 is God directing His own to enter the gates of the tyrant. The most convincing piece of evidence for this comes from Job 21:28 where he, by the influence of the Holy Spirit, calls this so-called house of the nobleman, the dwelling places of the wicked.
Surely, you can see from the terminology, dwelling places, that this is not speaking about a house necessarily. When you look the word house up, as used by Job, you will get over seventeen hundred applications directing you to the idea of a home, whatever that looks like,
house - bayith
BDB Definition:
1) house
1a) house, dwelling habitation
1b) shelter or abode of animals
1c) human bodies (figuratively)
1d) of Sheol
1e) of abode of light and darkness
1f) of land of Ephraim
2) place
3) receptacle
The definition is rarely a tight fit for a particular concept, and we find that bayith was also used to define a dungeon twice and a prison.
Job speaks of a tent, specifically saying, “where is the tent?” This too is revealing, but you would never know that unless you decided to probe deeper.
Tent is the Hebrew word 'ôhel / o'-hel, and means a tent (as clearly conspicuous from a distance). This is the same word that used to describe the tabernacle that Israel built in the desert. In a sense, it was an edifice, meant to be seen.

So, Babylon is a structure that is not so tightly defined, intended to be seen, and, most likely filled with tyrants/giants – but giants of what?
These influential people have turned their backs on God and the have-nots of the world and are intentionally destroying economies for their personal benefit.
Do not think for a second that governments are not part of this or, at the least in collusion, as we can see their irrational decisions and complacency, to the point that they play golf while the country under their watch is destroyed from within.
By the way. I do not think it is fair to the poor to address them as such. At the date of this writing, Louisiana has suffered what they are calling a 500-year flood. Almost in an instant many of the people, who do not live in a flood plain and therefore have no access to flood insurance, have lost everything and have no way of replacing what they lost. In October of 2012, Money magazine stated in an article that 30 million people were on the edge of poverty. Considering that many live on credit cards, merely opening another when one gets maxed out. The problem with that tactic is that the bills will catch up with you, and your entire paycheck is then committed to payments. What does poverty look like when you live in a state where the median income is fifty thousand dollars a year and the average price of a home, even in the worst of neighborhoods, is in the mid $300,000 range. You will not attain this median income unless you obtain a bachelor's degree at minimum, and even then that guarantees nothing. I spent some time working at Home Depot and worked with many who had such degrees. They worked at the hardware store, hoping to get into management because they could not find a job in their field of study. An example of this might be the aerospace industry, which pulled up stakes and moved to Arizona about fifteen years ago.
Well, I made it through three verses. Stay tuned and we will continue to pursue understanding.

Featured Post

Will we have to go through the tribulation?

Then I heard a loud voice from the temple, saying to the seven angels, "Go and pour out on the earth the seven bowls of the wrath of...